Network and Storage Protocols

54.6 MB/s iSCSI GbEthernet between Linux (RH5) and FAS2020

umonteiro
4,354 Views

average 54.6 MB/s is normal speed  for GigaEthernet ? ( I have just FAS2020 -> SwitchEnterasysC3(HighSpeedGigabitEthernet) -> Linux(broadcom GigabitEthernet) )

When I tried to use dd to force write data in FAS2020 the process is used 100%, this is one bottleneck problem or this is normal ?

ISCSI

Like above

[root@oraclesrv mnt]# dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/sda bs=5M count=1000 conv=notrunc
1000+0 records in
1000+0 records out
5242880000 bytes (5.2 GB) copied, 95.9385 seconds, 54.6 MB/s

filer2> sysstat -i -s 2
CPU    NFS   CIFS  iSCSI      Net kB/s     Disk kB/s     iSCSI  kB/s    Cache
                               in   out     read  write      in   out      age
  4%      8      0      0     227    24       22      0       0     0      10
  1%     19      0      0       5    82      576     16       0     0      10
  4%      0      0      0       2     4       12     12       0     0      10
74%    316      0     82   43072  1042     1130  39734   39213     0       7
94%      0      0    117   61546  1371      666  74028   58655     0       5
99%    124      0    104   56693  1362      728  65542   53117     0       5
99%      0      0    112   62428  1400      744  74212   59507     0       5
99%      0      0    112   64355  1435      768  79680   61213     0       5
96%      9      0    112   62747  1419     1016  71034   59441     0       5
99%      0      0    110   58443  1324      414  64812   55640     0       5
99%      0      0    122   64568  1439     1002  77548   61506     0       5
95%     10      0     95   55751  1275     1386  67932   52691     0       5
100%      0      0    104   52392  1176      782  59652   49807     0       5

5 REPLIES 5

it_4
4,354 Views

Hi umonteiro

I may have the same issue as yours, but I would love to get 55MB/s I get only 15/20MBs

My config is FAS2050 (ONTAP 7.2.6.1) with 2 controllers / 2 aggregates / (1) aggregate has only 3 disk, the other one (2) has 16 Disks + 1 Spare.

All my production is on the aggregate 2, only 3 ESX servers connected to it.

My aggregate (2) has 11 volumes- as you will see only 3 of them are only - They are NFS volume.

My NAS/SAN switch is a Dell 2724 1GB ports

I believe I have a performance issue, I'm evaluating a backup solution name Veeam Backup 4.0 and the performance I get is low 15/20MB/s

db01offline,raid_dp aggr0------
dstore01online,raid_dp,sis aggr0-276 GB51%560 GB71624.2 m
dstore02online,raid_dp,sis aggr0-492 GB12%560 GB37624.2 m
exchdboffline,raid_dp aggr0------
exchlogoffline,raid_dp aggr0------
fs01online,raid_dp,sis aggr0-180 GB64%500 GB13919 m
sqldb01offline,raid_dp aggr0------
sqldb02offline,raid_dp aggr0------
sqllogs01offline,raid_dp aggr0------
sqllogs02offline,raid_dp aggr0------
vol0online,raid_dp/na_admin/images/check12x12white.gifaggr0-172 GB0%172 GB5.11 k7.45 m

During a backup I see this with sysstat, it looks pretty weird for me, and seems to act as a Diesel

I may get rid of the iSCSI volume I did create a long time ago, and then expand my NFS volume will this help my performance ?


sto-fas02*> sysstat
CPU    NFS   CIFS   HTTP      Net kB/s     Disk kB/s      Tape kB/s    Cache
                               in   out     read  write    read write     age
  3%     69      0      0     240   356      666    402       0     0       2
  3%     73      0      0     278   116      607    827       0     0       2
  2%     62      0      0     325   100      374    414       0     0       3
  6%    437      0      0    2066   492      713    773       0     0       3
  6%    185      0      0     814    74      514   2470       0     0       3
  3%    117      0      0     458    38      282    491       0     0       3
  5%    311      0      1     277   156      430    814       0     0       4
  6%    354      0      0     550  1456     1681    595       0     0       4
19%    586      0      0     513 17383    18385    876       0     0       4
18%    846      0      0     747 14889    12753    405       0     0       4
15%    517      0      0     512 13114    13486    672       0     0       5
24%    864      0      0     712 20726    21227   1203       0     0       5
24%    695      0      0    1238 27682    12851   1314       0     0       5
31%    681      0      0     639 42056     7107    797       0     0      21s
18%    414      0      0     458 20463    20154    440       0     0      33s
18%    415      0      0     395 19792    19593    771       0     0      45s
18%    409      0      0     427 21262    20330    357       0     0      57s
17%    405      0      0     352 20404    19746    358       0     0       1
19%    561      0      0     475 20125    20248    639       0     0       1
  18%    572      0      0     620 22212    20805    576       0     0       1
16%    365      0      0     426 21039    20251    813       0     0       1
12%    281      0      0     286 16311    15486    345       0     0       2
12%    279      0      0     323 15853    15336    650       0     0       2
16%    376      0      0     403 21498    20395    366       0     0       2
13%    300      0      0     355 16603    16013    664       0     0       2
12%    292      0      0     276 16612    15895    311       0     0       2
19%    455      0      0     515 25375    22111    444       0     0       3
32%    734      0      0     784 44725    42458    714       0     0       2
31%    742      0      0     702 45766    43340    602       0     0       2
31%    738      0      0     644 45724    43410    710       0     0       4
32%    775      0      0     746 46959    44521    398       0     0       4
32%    758      0      0     724 46655    44337    843       0     0       3
30%    734      0      0     664 45463    42988    332       0     0       3
30%    695      0      0     582 43532    41256    614       0     0       3
30%    696      0      0     703 42801    40308    338       0     0       3
15%    383      0      0     847 14154    14238    778       0     0       5
  3%    209      0      0     334   146      467   1044       0     0       5
  2%     41      0      0     173    63      379    430       0     0       5
  6%    524      0      0     541  1011     1278    837       0     0       3

What is going on ?

What can I do to troubleshot this, and of course increase my NAS performance ?

Thanks

radek_kubka
4,354 Views

Backups jobs tend to do a lot of sequential reads, so I'd recommend running realocate command to a) check the level of volume fragmentation, b) do the defrag if required.

Regards,

Radek

radek_kubka
4,354 Views

CPU is incredibly busy which makes me ask this question - are jumbo frames enabled end to end?

Here are some previous discussions around this topic:

http://communities.netapp.com/thread/6052

http://communities.netapp.com/thread/6000

Regards,
Radek

it_4
4,354 Views

Radek,

a) check the level of volume fragmentation and defrag

Are you speaking about the NEtapp volume ? if so, can you tell me how to check and defrag the volume ? can it be done during work hours ?

radek_kubka
4,354 Views

a) check the level of volume fragmentation and defrag

Are you speaking about the NEtapp volume ?

Yes, exactly.

Have you got access to SE communities? If so, check this out:

http://communities.netapp.com/thread/4431?tstart=0

Also some interesting reading here:

http://communities.netapp.com/message/12535#12535

And obviously reading on NOW site:

http://now.netapp.com/NOW/knowledge/docs/ontap/rel7311_vs/html/ontap/sysadmin/tuning/concept/c_oc_tun_reallocate-general.html#c_oc_tun_reallocate-gene...

Regards,

Radek

Public