NetApp Community Update
This site will enter Read Only mode on July 23 as we prepare to move to a new platform. You will still be able to view content, but posting and replying will be temporarily disabled.
We're excited to launch our new Community experience on July 30 and more information will follow soon.
Stay connected during the transition - Join our Discord community today.

ONTAP Discussions

Aggregate performance issue after adding disks

mkopenski
6,780 Views

After adding 4 disks to an aggregate one of them is at a constant 100% utilization, currently running a reallocate.

The question is why is only that one disk at 100% while the other ones that were added ~25% along with the rest of the disks in the raid group?

Current status of the aggregate is redirect, which is expected I guess.

Any suggestions?

7 REPLIES 7

mkopenski
6,781 Views

Here are the stats of that aggregate from statit - 1b.89 is at 100 , 1b.88 2c.29 and 2b.59 were the other disks that were added

/aggr1/plex0/rg0:
4c.60              4  11.76    0.33   1.00  9722   5.44  26.41   243   5.99   8.93   451   0.00   ....     .   0.00   ....     .
4c.61              4  12.08    0.33   1.00 22556   5.81  24.85   220   5.94   8.68   486   0.00   ....     .   0.00   ....     .
4c.45             26  55.48   44.41   2.92  5229   4.01  13.32  1123   7.07   9.08  1141   0.00   ....     .   0.00   ....     .
4c.49             22  50.59   39.62   2.97  4436   3.51  13.93   931   7.46   9.40   848   0.00   ....     .   0.00   ....     .
4c.50             24  54.13   43.24   2.93  4607   3.49  14.91   872   7.40   9.33  1164   0.00   ....     .   0.00   ....     .
2c.51             24  53.83   42.98   2.87  4695   3.32  13.49   812   7.53  10.01   996   0.00   ....     .   0.00   ....     .
4c.52             24  55.43   44.26   2.73  5159   3.49  13.96   859   7.68   9.03   990   0.00   ....     .   0.00   ....     .
4c.53             24  53.39   42.22   3.01  4516   3.60  14.21   911   7.57   9.28  1014   0.00   ....     .   0.00   ....     .
4c.54             23  50.81   39.66   2.93  4677   3.58  13.87   947   7.57   9.73   993   0.00   ....     .   0.00   ....     .
2c.55             23  52.12   41.37   3.04  4380   3.43  13.41   885   7.33   9.89  1066   0.00   ....     .   0.00   ....     .
2c.56             24  54.28   43.05   2.97  4684   3.97  14.16   917   7.25   9.33   944   0.00   ....     .   0.00   ....     .
4c.57             25  56.02   44.82   2.96  4536   3.75  13.78   959   7.46   9.40   974   0.00   ....     .   0.00   ....     .
2c.58             23  52.35   41.92   2.89  4758   3.30  13.37   929   7.12  10.37   906   0.00   ....     .   0.00   ....     .
2c.59             25  55.65   44.45   3.10  4551   3.73  15.05   925   7.48   8.68  1190   0.00   ....     .   0.00   ....     .
2c.48             23  50.90   40.10   2.51  5662   3.71  16.82   683   7.09   8.96  1147   0.00   ....     .   0.00   ....     .
2b.87             23  48.75   38.95   2.17  6092   4.34  28.68   338   5.45   8.01   561   0.00   ....     .   0.00   ....     .
2b.59             21  47.78   38.14   2.10  5910   4.60  29.73   368   5.05   9.32   721   0.00   ....     .   0.00   ....     .
2c.29             22  47.01   37.34   2.22  5791   4.64  29.49   384   5.03   9.47  1143   0.00   ....     .   0.00   ....     .
1b.88             22  47.84   38.23   2.09  6850   4.56  29.97   296   5.05   9.27   495   0.00   ....     .   0.00   ....     .
1b.89            100  47.17   37.53   1.93 79596   4.60  29.81  5836   5.05   9.14 23635   0.00   ....     .   0.00   ....     .

cedric_renauld
6,781 Views

Hi Mark

So the 1b.89 disk ins't the Parity drive ?

Cf with sysconfig -r ... Maybee

mkopenski
6,781 Views

It is a data disk, none of the other disks are showing any issues like

this

data 1b.89 1b 5 9 FC:B - FCAL 15000

272000/557056000 280104/573653840

mkopenski
6,781 Views

Support had me fail a disk, which leveled the io across the raid group

amiller_1
6,781 Views

That's definitely one approach -- if happens in the future I'd look at the reallocate command as well (at the physical level).

mkopenski
6,781 Views

Did start a reallocate after adding the disks, was going very slow

The suggestion to prevent this in the future was - simplified

1. Try to free up space in aggregate <90% and clean up snapshots - This one was at 91.3%

2. Run reallocate before adding disks.

3. Add less disks at a time

4. Run reallocate after adding disks

amiller_1
6,781 Views

Very helpful to know what worked in real life....thanks for posting back.

Public