Hi Team, We have a large Federal Integrator that has ExaGrid deployed across 11 sites. Do we have any competitive intel on how we compete with them? I could not find a Battle Card on the Field Portal Thanks, Ben
... View more
I have a powershell script that has been working well for the past 4 yrs., Recently I migrated the script to a new environment and it started giving errors what the script does is to login the source filer A, change the snapshots' snapmirror labels to "daily" then snapvault these snapshots to the destination filer B When i run it, it seems the script is able to login both filer A and filer B, and replicate the snapshots over. It failed on getting the snapshots, and gave me 400 errors are below PS C:\Users\adm_gwen> powershell.exe E:\Scripts\Veeam-NetAppSnaplock\Set-SM-Label-Update_SV-With-File_Input.ps1 -PrimaryCluster "PUG3AXRSTR1.pue1m.ad" -PrimarySVM "PUG3AXRSTR1-vs01" -ClusterUser veeam -ClusterPass "E:\Scripts\Veeam-NetAppSnaplock\password.txt" -PassKey "E:\Scripts\Veeam-NetAppSnaplock\AES.key" -SecondaryCluster "pcs1bxdsbr.pcs1m.ad" -SecondarySVM "pcs1bxdsbr-uge-vs01" -VolumeListFile "E:\Scripts\Veeam-NetAppSnaplock\SiteA_pug3axrstr_oasys.txt" [04.03.2025 15:01:22] Starting new log file [04.03.2025 15:01:22] Trying to load NetApp Powershell module [04.03.2025 15:01:22] Loaded NetApp Powershell module sucessfully [04.03.2025 15:01:22] Trying to connect to SVM PUG3AXRSTR1-vs01 on cluster PUG3AXRSTR1.pue1m.ad [04.03.2025 15:01:24] Connection established to PUG3AXRSTR1-vs01 on cluster PUG3AXRSTR1.pue1m.ad Get-NcSnapshot : The remote server returned an error: (400) Bad Request. At E:\Scripts\Veeam-NetAppSnaplock\Set-SM-Label-Update_SV-With-File_Input.ps1:239 char:3 + Get-NcSnapshot -SnapName *Veeam* | Set-NcSnapshot -SnapmirrorLabel ... + ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ + CategoryInfo : NotSpecified: (:) [Get-NcSnapshot], WebException + FullyQualifiedErrorId : System.Net.WebException,DataONTAP.C.PowerShell.SDK.Cmdlets.Snapshot.GetNcSnapshot [04.03.2025 15:01:24] Trying to connect to SVM pcs1bxdsbr-uge-vs01 on cluster pcs1bxdsbr.pcs1m.ad [04.03.2025 15:01:28] Connection established to pcs1bxdsbr-uge-vs01 on cluster pcs1bxdsbr.pcs1m.ad [04.03.2025 15:01:28] File E:\Scripts\Veeam-NetAppSnaplock\SiteA_pug3axrstr_oasys.txt was found [04.03.2025 15:01:29] Volume tp_pug3axrstr1_vs01_pgu3arj_esx_ds_data_bc_even01_vol was found [04.03.2025 15:01:29] SecondarySVM: pcs1bxdsbr-uge-vs01 [04.03.2025 15:01:29] SecondaryVolume: tp_pug3axrstr1_vs01_pgu3arj_esx_ds_data_bc_even01_vol VERBOSE: Updating SnapMirror with destination //pcs1bxdsbr-uge-vs01/tp_pug3axrstr1_vs01_pgu3arj_esx_ds_data_bc_even01_vol. NcController : pcs1bxdsbr.pcs1m.ad ResultOperationId : 76301282-f933-11ef-bcd2-d039eabd3a83 ErrorCode : ErrorMessage : JobId : JobVserver : Status : succeeded Uuid : Message : [04.03.2025 15:01:29] Volume tp_pug3axrstr1_vs01_pgu3arj_esx_ds_data_bc_odd01_vol was found [04.03.2025 15:01:29] SecondarySVM: pcs1bxdsbr-uge-vs01 [04.03.2025 15:01:29] SecondaryVolume: tp_pug3axrstr1_vs01_pgu3arj_esx_ds_data_bc_odd01_vol VERBOSE: Updating SnapMirror with destination //pcs1bxdsbr-uge-vs01/tp_pug3axrstr1_vs01_pgu3arj_esx_ds_data_bc_odd01_vol. NcController : pcs1bxdsbr.pcs1m.ad ResultOperationId : 768f5208-f933-11ef-bcd2-d039eabd3a83 ErrorCode : ErrorMessage : JobId : JobVserver : Status : succeeded Uuid : Message : [04.03.2025 15:01:30] Volume tp_pug3axrstr1_vs01_pgu3arj_esx_ds_data_nbc_even01_vol was found Any help is appreciated!
... View more
I am not sure if this is the correct forum, but I did see other posts about NetApp volumes here. Please advise of the correct forum if needed. On the Google Cloud Platform, I deployed a STANDARD service level 2048gb NetApp storagepool in uscentral1. Then I created a 100gb volume also in uscentral1. I have a question about this volume's performance. When I use the FIND command to traverse through a directory, the performance is noticeably slower on the Netapp volume versus the same data on the local drive. At first I was thinking I needed to increase my throughput performance by increasing my service level or making the volume bigger(which increases throughput performance). But after thinking about it, my FIND command is not moving data, it's just traversing through the directory. So it seems this is not a throughput issue? Does anyone have insight as to the performance issue here: root@server1:~# time find /data_local/cache/4c71-4cb6-bd50-d80aa7/ -type f | wc -l 4995 real 0m0.119s user 0m0.058s sys 0m0.059s root@server1:~# time find /data_NetappVol/cache/4c71-4cb6-bd50-d80aa7/ -type f | wc -l 4995 real 0m3.968s user 0m0.078s sys 0m0.219s
... View more
Hello , I'd like to share the same vlan in multiple SVMs for AV setup ( create additional LIF in each Vlan ) Actually ALL SMVs are in the same domain , but each SVM as their proper VLAN ,ipspace and broadcast-domain for data traffic .
... View more
Hello, I connected LUN Netapp on windows server. It works prefectly but, i found that antiransomware is not enable on LUN Netapp. 😞 Also, it seems, it is not possible to restore file, just somes files on LUN volume from snapshot, that is true ? It is possible restore all the volume but not somes files Also, tiering policy not work on LUN volume ? thanks a lot
... View more
