Options
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Hi,
my FAS2554 (20x4TB+4x400SSD) is running 8.3.2P12 and works fine (I'm using only NFS as protocol).
Now I would like upgrade to 9.1P19 as suggested by Upgrade Advisor because for 8.3 NetApp don't provide anymore support.
Since FAS2554 was born with 8.3 so, is safe and recommended upgrade to 9.1?
Should I expect a drop in performance?
Thanks
Solved! See The Solution
1 ACCEPTED SOLUTION
alessice has accepted the solution
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
We have FAS25xx series controllers running 9.5P4 with no issue, and upgrades have made them faster, not slower (when using the same features/workloads).
6 REPLIES 6
alessice has accepted the solution
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
We have FAS25xx series controllers running 9.5P4 with no issue, and upgrades have made them faster, not slower (when using the same features/workloads).
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
I'd go as high as possible. There are a few things that will make 9.3+ better. Ideally if you can go to 9.5Platest that would be the best.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Thanks Paul,
I will follow the upgrade path provided from Upgrade Advisor, so 8.3 -> 9.1, 9.1 -> 9.x and so on.
But ONTAP 9.5 can works fine with FAS2554 that have less RAM than 2750 (36GB vs 64GB)?
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Yes. I've seen several filers on 9.5 on 2500s.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
One gotcha we just identified. A SSL cert expired on the 6th within ONTAP, so if you go past 9.1 to 9.3 then 9.5, you will encounter an error. See https://kb.netapp.com/app/answers/answer_view/a_id/1089462 for more information.
If you encounter this problem this is well documented and Support can help on a case when doing the upgrade, otherwise patch releases for 9.3 and 9.5 will be out in a few days it seems.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Hi,
I have done the upgrade via CLI and all works fine.
Only one thing need to fix, about every 5 minutes in the Events Log I found this debug messages:
acp.command.connect: Could not establish connection with 192.168.2.145.
acp.command.connect: Could not establish connection with 192.168.2.145.
and from console:
cluster2::> storage shelf acp module show Node Module Name State ----------------- ----------------- ---------------------- cluster2-node01 1.0.B connection-error 1.0.A connection-error cluster2-node02 1.0.B connection-error 1.0.A connection-error 4 entries were displayed. cluster2::> storage shelf acp show Node Channel Connectivity ------------------ --------------- ---------------------- cluster2-node01 out-of-band full-connectivity cluster2-node02 out-of-band full-connectivity 2 entries were displayed. cluster2::> storage shelf acp show -instance Node: cluster2-node01 Channel: out-of-band Enable Status: true Port: e0P IP Address: 192.168.2.55 Subnet: 192.168.0.1 Netmask: 255.255.252.0 Connection Status: full-connectivity Node: cluster2-node02 Channel: out-of-band Enable Status: true Port: e0P IP Address: 192.168.1.253 Subnet: 192.168.0.1 Netmask: 255.255.252.0 Connection Status: full-connectivity 2 entries were displayed. cluster2::> storage shelf acp module show -instance Node: cluster2-node01 Module Name: 1.0.B Adapter Name: 0a MAC Address: 00:a0:98:c6:ea:91 IOM Type: iom6e Shelf Serial Number: SHJHU1702000451 IP Address: 192.168.2.145 Protocol Version: 2.1.01.22 Firmware Version: 01.22 Assigner ID: 537067641 State: connection-error Last Contact: 514 Node: cluster2-node01 Module Name: 1.0.A Adapter Name: 0a MAC Address: 00:a0:98:c6:ed:91 IOM Type: iom6e Shelf Serial Number: SHJHU1702000451 IP Address: 192.168.1.145 Protocol Version: 2.1.01.22 Firmware Version: 01.22 Assigner ID: 537067641 State: active Last Contact: 36 Node: cluster2-node02 Module Name: 1.0.B Adapter Name: 0b MAC Address: 00:a0:98:c6:ea:91 IOM Type: iom6e Shelf Serial Number: SHJHU1702000451 IP Address: 192.168.2.145 Protocol Version: 2.1.01.22 Firmware Version: 01.22 Assigner ID: 537067641 State: connection-error Last Contact: 514 Node: cluster2-node02 Module Name: 1.0.A Adapter Name: 0b MAC Address: 00:a0:98:c6:ed:91 IOM Type: iom6e Shelf Serial Number: SHJHU1702000451 IP Address: 192.168.1.145 Protocol Version: 2.1.01.22 Firmware Version: 01.22 Assigner ID: 537067641 State: active Last Contact: 36 4 entries were displayed. cluster2::> system service-processor show IP Firmware Node Type Status Configured Version IP Address ------------- ---- ----------- ------------ --------- ------------------------- cluster2-node01 SP online true 2.4.1P2 192.168.7.210 cluster2-node02 SP online true 2.4.1P2 192.168.7.211 2 entries were displayed.
I need to fix somethings?
Thanks
