ONTAP Discussions
ONTAP Discussions
Hello,
in my testsystem with Data Ontap 7 one of my disks faild in DS14mk2 FC.
The sysconfig output shows me the failed disk is
X276_S10K7288F10
Now my question, it must be exactly this disk , or is there a matrix Which other disk that work for this configiruation???
slot 0: FC Host Adapter 0a (QLogic 2432 rev. 2, L-port, <UP>) Firmware rev: 4.5.2 Host Loop Id: 7 FC Node Name: 5:00a:098000:28756b SFP Vendor: AVAGO SFP Part Number: AFBR-57R6APZ-NA1 SFP Serial Number: B91052AJB3 SFP Capabilities: 1, 2 or 4 Gbit Link Data Rate: 2 Gbit 16 : NETAPP X276_S10K7288F10 NA07 272.0GB 520B/sect (3KR1B3V300007619BP0N) 17 : NETAPP X276_S10K7288F10 NA07 272.0GB 520B/sect (3KR1845Q00007618BGUG) 18 : NETAPP X276_S10K7288F10 NA07 272.0GB 520B/sect (3KR1B4RE00007618E2F5) 19 : NETAPP X276_S10K7288F10 NA07 272.0GB 520B/sect (3KR19A3X000076195SCS) 20 : NETAPP X276_S10K7288F10 NA07 272.0GB 520B/sect (3KR1AYFM00007619BMMY) 21 : NETAPP X276_S10K7288F10 NA07 272.0GB 520B/sect (3KR17ZT700007619TKTQ) 22 : NETAPP X276_S10K7288F10 NA07 272.0GB 520B/sect (3KR1ARVS00007619TLRA) 23 : NETAPP X276_S10K7288F10 NA07 272.0GB 520B/sect (3KR1AZ1Y00007619R3RJ) 24 : NETAPP X276_S10K7288F10 NA07 272.0GB 520B/sect (3KR19M0R00007619BL92) 25 : NETAPP X276_S10K7288F10 NA07 272.0GB 520B/sect (3KR18BBD000076197C80) 26 : NETAPP X276_S10K7288F10 NA07 272.0GB 520B/sect (3KR1AT6N000076195RWL) 27 : NETAPP X276_S10K7288F10 NA07 272.0GB 520B/sect (Failed) 28 : NETAPP X276_S10K7288F10 NA07 272.0GB 520B/sect (3KR13YKT00007614NY91) 29 : NETAPP X279_HVPBP288F15 NA02 272.0GB 520B/sect (JLWZWR4C) 32 : NETAPP X276_S10K7288F10 NA07 272.0GB 520B/sect (3KR185KK000076199H3P) 33 : NETAPP X276_S10K7288F10 NA07 272.0GB 520B/sect (3KR1BRKX00007609F8HV) 34 : NETAPP X276_S10K7288F10 NA07 272.0GB 520B/sect (3KR1BPPE00007620N3TW) 35 : NETAPP X279_HVPBP288F15 NA02 272.0GB 520B/sect (JLXAYJHC) 36 : NETAPP X279_HVPBP288F15 NA02 272.0GB 520B/sect (JLXB8DRC) 37 : NETAPP X279_HVPBP288F15 NA02 272.0GB 520B/sect (JLXAZPNC) 38 : NETAPP X279_HVPBP288F15 NA02 272.0GB 520B/sect (JLX9Z64C) 39 : NETAPP X279_HVPBP288F15 NA02 272.0GB 520B/sect (JLX9Z6XC) 40 : NETAPP X279_HVPBP288F15 NA02 272.0GB 520B/sect (JLXBG7HC) 41 : NETAPP X279_HVPBP288F15 NA02 272.0GB 520B/sect (JLXBNZAC) 42 : NETAPP X279_HVPBP288F15 NA02 272.0GB 520B/sect (JLXB9SJE) 43 : NETAPP X279_HVPBP288F15 NA02 272.0GB 520B/sect (JLXB9GHC) 44 : NETAPP X279_HVPBP288F15 NA02 272.0GB 520B/sect (JLXT797C) 45 : NETAPP X279_HVPBP288F15 NA02 272.0GB 520B/sect (JLXBNP7C) Shelf 1: ESH4 Firmware rev. ESH A: 14 ESH B: 14 Shelf 2: ESH4 Firmware rev. ESH A: 14 ESH B: 14 I/O base 0x0000ee00, size 0x100 memory mapped I/O base 0xd9200000, size 0x4000
thanks for help and the right infomation.
Greetings,
Stefan
Solved! See The Solution
Hi Stefan,
the part number X276 refers to a 300GB 10k RPM FC disk.
This specific one is from Seagate, but any other NetApp-provided 300GB FC disk would work.
As you see from the sysconfig output you also have 300GB 15k RPM FC disks in the system, which have the part number X279.
Both X276 and X279 are valid replacements for your failed disk.
NetApp has a dual-source policy, meaning you might get replacement parts from different vendors. But as long as the NetApp part number matches, there is no issue.
regards, Niels
Hi Stefan,
the part number X276 refers to a 300GB 10k RPM FC disk.
This specific one is from Seagate, but any other NetApp-provided 300GB FC disk would work.
As you see from the sysconfig output you also have 300GB 15k RPM FC disks in the system, which have the part number X279.
Both X276 and X279 are valid replacements for your failed disk.
NetApp has a dual-source policy, meaning you might get replacement parts from different vendors. But as long as the NetApp part number matches, there is no issue.
regards, Niels
Hi Niels,
thanks a lot for your message, it hepls me. I don' t find this information in the netapp knowlegebase.
regards, Stefan
when i right understand, this is the matrix on the basis of one can search the hard disks?
http://mysupport.netapp.com/NOW/download/tools/diskfw/
Hi Stefan,
that's just the list of available firmware for the different drives.
I think what you are looking for might better be found in the Hardware Universe (HWU):
http://hwu.netapp.com/Drives/Index
regards, Niels
Niels, perfect. Thank you very much. That is it.
Regards
Stefan
another question, i've found the raid has taken a disk from a different shelf . all disks are FC , replacing is a SAS disk . my question , I should remove it from the SAS raid so that they will again be replaced by a FC disk ? Or does it not matter?
nodea> sysconfig -r Aggregate aggr0_fc (online, raid_dp) (block checksums) Plex /aggr0_fc/plex0 (online, normal, active) RAID group /aggr0_fc/plex0/rg0 (normal) RAID Disk Device HA SHELF BAY CHAN Pool Type RPM Used (MB/blks) Phys (MB/blks) --------- ------ ------------- ---- ---- ---- ----- -------------- -------------- dparity 0a.35 0a 2 3 FC:A - FCAL 15000 272000/557056000 274845/562884296 parity 0a.17 0a 1 1 FC:A - FCAL 10000 272000/557056000 280104/573653840 data 0c.00.10 0c 0 10 SA:A - SAS 15000 272000/557056000 274845/562884296 data 0a.21 0a 1 5 FC:A - FCAL 10000 272000/557056000 280104/573653840 data 0a.25 0a 1 9 FC:A - FCAL 10000 272000/557056000 280104/573653840 data 0a.23 0a 1 7 FC:A - FCAL 10000 272000/557056000 280104/573653840 data 0a.19 0a 1 3 FC:A - FCAL 10000 272000/557056000 280104/573653840 data 0a.32 0a 2 0 FC:A - FCAL 10000 272000/557056000 280104/573653840 data 0a.33 0a 2 1 FC:A - FCAL 10000 272000/557056000 280104/573653840 data 0a.34 0a 2 2 FC:A - FCAL 10000 272000/557056000 280104/573653840 data 0a.37 0a 2 5 FC:A - FCAL 15000 272000/557056000 274845/562884296 data 0a.29 0a 1 13 FC:A - FCAL 15000 272000/557056000 274845/562884296 data 0a.36 0a 2 4 FC:A - FCAL 15000 272000/557056000 274845/562884296 Aggregate aggr1_sas (online, raid_dp) (block checksums) Plex /aggr1_sas/plex0 (online, normal, active) RAID group /aggr1_sas/plex0/rg0 (normal) RAID Disk Device HA SHELF BAY CHAN Pool Type RPM Used (MB/blks) Phys (MB/blks) --------- ------ ------------- ---- ---- ---- ----- -------------- -------------- dparity 0c.00.0 0c 0 0 SA:A - SAS 15000 272000/557056000 274845/562884296 parity 0c.00.1 0c 0 1 SA:A - SAS 15000 272000/557056000 274845/562884296 data 0c.00.2 0c 0 2 SA:A - SAS 15000 272000/557056000 274845/562884296 data 0c.00.3 0c 0 3 SA:A - SAS 15000 272000/557056000 274845/562884296 data 0c.00.4 0c 0 4 SA:A - SAS 15000 272000/557056000 274845/562884296 data 0c.00.5 0c 0 5 SA:A - SAS 15000 272000/557056000 274845/562884296 data 0c.00.6 0c 0 6 SA:A - SAS 15000 272000/557056000 274845/562884296 data 0c.00.7 0c 0 7 SA:A - SAS 15000 272000/557056000 274845/562884296 data 0c.00.8 0c 0 8 SA:A - SAS 15000 272000/557056000 274845/562884296 data 0c.00.9 0c 0 9 SA:A - SAS 15000 272000/557056000 274845/562884296 Spare disks RAID Disk Device HA SHELF BAY CHAN Pool Type RPM Used (MB/blks) Phys (MB/blks) --------- ------ ------------- ---- ---- ---- ----- -------------- -------------- Spare disks for block or zoned checksum traditional volumes or aggregates spare 0a.27 0a 1 11 FC:A - FCAL 10000 272000/557056000 280104/573653840 (zeroing, 11% done) spare 0a.38 0a 2 6 FC:A - FCAL 15000 272000/557056000 274845/562884296 spare 0a.39 0a 2 7 FC:A - FCAL 15000 272000/557056000 274845/562884296 spare 0c.00.11 0c 0 11 SA:A - SAS 15000 272000/557056000 274845/562884296
regards,
Stefan
Please have a look here for details:
http://www.netapp.com/us/media/tr-3548.pdf
Page 38
Excerpt:
######
NetApp recommends NOT mixing "old and new" compatible drive technologies. In the context of fabric MetroCluster, this implies that:
- NetApp does not recommend creating an aggregate with a mix of DS14MK4 FC disks and SAS disks, but it is supported.
- NetApp does not recommend expanding existing DS14MK4 FC aggregates with SAS disks, but it is supported.
- NetApp does not recommend creating SyncMirror relationships between DS14MK4 FC disks and SAS disks, but it is supported.
######
As you are dealing with a test system here I wouldn't see an issue.
If you want the aggregate to be comprised of FC disks only, just use the following command:
disk replace start 0c.00.10 0a.27
If you want to prevent from SAS disks to replace broken FC disks check the following option:
options raid.mix.hdd.disktype.capacity on
on = allow FC and SAS to replace each other
off= keep aggregate homogeneous
Kind regards, Niels
Hi Niels,
thank you for the information, thats help me. I am changing the disks.
The options
options raid.mix.hdd.disktype.capacity on
is in Ontap 7 not available.
Regards
Stefan
Well - I verified that command on a 7-mode MetroCLuster, but it may be running a different version than yours.
Just try the command "options raid" and look for a similar looking option. It should definitely be there.
Kind regards, Niels
Hi Niels,
nodea> options raid raid.background_disk_fw_update.enable on (value might be overwritten in takeover) raid.disk.background_fw_update.raid4.enable on (value might be overwritten in takeover) raid.disk.copy.auto.enable on (value might be overwritten in takeover) raid.disktype.enable off (value might be overwritten in takeover) raid.media_scrub.enable on (value might be overwritten in takeover) raid.media_scrub.rate 600 (value might be overwritten in takeover) raid.media_scrub.spares.enable on (value might be overwritten in takeover) raid.min_spare_count 1 (value might be overwritten in takeover) raid.mirror_read_plex_pref local (value might be overwritten in takeover) raid.reconstruct.perf_impact medium (value might be overwritten in takeover) raid.reconstruct.wafliron.enable on (value might be overwritten in takeover) raid.resync.perf_impact medium (value might be overwritten in takeover) raid.rpm.ata.enable off (value might be overwritten in takeover) raid.rpm.fcal.enable on (value might be overwritten in takeover) raid.scrub.duration 360 raid.scrub.enable on raid.scrub.perf_impact low (value might be overwritten in takeover) raid.scrub.schedule raid.timeout 24 (value might be overwritten in takeover) raid.verify.perf_impact low (value might be overwritten in takeover)
i think the option raid.disktype.enable set to on.
Regards
Stefan
Yes - that's the respective option.
Details on how these options work on both ONTAP 8.1 and 8.2 is described here:https://kb.netapp.com/support/index?page=content&id=3013616&locale=en_USRegards, Niels
Niels, thank you for your great support.
Regards
Stefan