ONTAP Discussions
ONTAP Discussions
Hi Gurus
I met a strange SMSP/SMSQL issue about archive/dataset setting. Here is a SMSP6.1.1+SMSQL6.0+SDW6.4.2+Snapvault environment. we configure two backup(plus archival) jobs. one is SMSP job and one is SMSQL job for some non-Sharepoint DB. of coz, SMSP DB+Log and non-sharepoint DB+log were stored in separate LUN/volumes. all LUN occupied a dedicated volume and were put under Qtree.
Those two SMSP/SMSQL backup (plus archival) were always well. but about 5 days ago, SMSP jobs report error.
after checking the SMSQL log: it includes:
[DC01-SQL-01] WARNING: SnapInfo snapshot archiving is skipped due to invalid dataset name.
[DC01-SQL-01] Error Code: 0xc004096d Unable to perform SnapInfo directory archive backup operation. Database selected is either not configured for backup archive, or unable to perform backup archive due to failure during the primary backup.
we found on primary storage, the related backup (snapshot) were generated but could not be archived to Secondary side. but the SMSQL job could be completed (archived) successfully.
We suspected the SMSQL archival setting. after checking, we found all SMSP were unselected) (in fact, no one change that) and I could not even re-select them. It reported Primary storage is not configured properly or LUNs are not kept under Qtree.
But those SMSP DB/log and non-Sharepoint DB are stored in same Primary storage (of coz, also be archived to same secondary storage). and all LUNs are also put under qtree.
dc01-st3240a-01> lun show
/vol/EX_01_DB1_A/Q1/EXDB01 500.1g (536946278400) (r/w, online, mapped)
/vol/EX_01_DB1_A_LOG/Q1/EXDB01LOG 100.0g (107389255680) (r/w, online, mapped)
/vol/EX_01_DB6_P/Q1/EXDB06 500.1g (536946278400) (r/w, online, mapped)
/vol/EX_01_DB6_P_LOG/Q1/EXDB06LOG 100.0g (107389255680) (r/w, online, mapped)
/vol/EX_02_DB2_A/Q1/EXDB02 500.1g (536946278400) (r/w, online, mapped)
/vol/EX_02_DB2_A_LOG/Q1/EXDB02LOG 100.0g (107389255680) (r/w, online, mapped)
/vol/EX_02_DB7_P/Q1/EXDB07 500.1g (536946278400) (r/w, online, mapped)
/vol/EX_02_DB7_P_LOG/Q1/EXDB07LOG 100.0g (107389255680) (r/w, online, mapped)
/vol/EX_03_DB3_A/Q1/EXDB03 500.1g (536946278400) (r/w, online, mapped)
/vol/EX_03_DB3_A_LOG/Q1/EXDB03LOG 100.0g (107389255680) (r/w, online, mapped)
/vol/EX_03_DB8_P/Q1/EXDB08 500.1g (536946278400) (r/w, online, mapped)
/vol/EX_03_DB8_P_LOG/Q1/EXDB08LOG 100.0g (107389255680) (r/w, online, mapped)
/vol/EX_04_DB4_A/Q1/EXDB04 500.1g (536946278400) (r/w, online, mapped)
/vol/EX_04_DB4_A_LOG/Q1/EXDB04LOG 100.0g (107389255680) (r/w, online, mapped)
/vol/EX_04_DB9_P/Q1/EXDB09 500.1g (536946278400) (r/w, online, mapped)
/vol/EX_04_DB9_P_LOG/Q1/EXDB09LOG 100.0g (107389255680) (r/w, online, mapped)
/vol/EX_05_DB10_P/Q1/EXDB10 500.1g (536946278400) (r/w, online, mapped)
/vol/EX_05_DB10_P_LOG/Q1/EXDB10LOG 100.0g (107389255680) (r/w, online, mapped)
/vol/EX_05_DB5_A/Q1/EXDB05 500.1g (536946278400) (r/w, online, mapped)
/vol/EX_05_DB5_A_LOG/Q1/EXDB05LOG 100.0g (107389255680) (r/w, online, mapped)
/vol/SECPORTAL/Q1/LUNDATA1 500.1g (536946278400) (r/w, online, mapped) -Sharepoint DB
/vol/SECPORTAL02_DB/Q1/LUNDB 30.0g (32169070080) (r/w, online, mapped) - non-Sharepoint DB
/vol/SECPORTAL02_LOG/Q1/LUNLOG 30.0g (32218421760) (r/w, online, mapped) - non-Sharepoint DB LUN
/vol/SECPORTALCLUSTER/Q1/LUNQUORUM1 1.0g (1077511680) (r/w, online, mapped)
/vol/SECPORTALCLUSTER/Q2/MSDTC01 5.0g (5371107840) (r/w, online, mapped)
/vol/SECPORTAL_LOG/Q1/LUNLOG1 44.0g (47246008320) (r/w, online, mapped) –Sharepoint DB log
/vol/SECPORTAL_SNAPINFO/Q1/LUNSNAPINFO1 35.0g (37581304320) (r/w, online, mapped)
/vol/SECPORTAL_SYSDB/Q1/SECPORTAL_SYSDB 20.0g (21476206080) (r/w, online, mapped)
/vol/SECVM01/Q1/LUN0 200g (214748364800) (r/w, online, mapped)
I have no idea what’s the root cause. Any input are appreciated.
BTW, I could manually trigger SDW to do snapvault.
BR
TC
Solved! See The Solution
I almost found the root casue.
It seems sharepoint automatically generate a new DB (performance*********) and deployed to storage by default. it's a little strange that LDF place is correct but MDF place is at system DB location. because SMSP job does not include this DB (no sync farm yet), then SMSP local backup works well. non-sharepoint MDF/LDF are at another seperate LUNs, so non-sharepoint DB SMSQL backup job is unimpacted.
but I don't know why it automatically unselected DB from dataset.
Tonight, we plan to migrate the DB to right place and check what will happen for backup archival seting
What is the status of your SnapVault realtionships for those qtrees in system manager, and protection manager? When was the last time the vault succeeded? The reason the SnapVault option is greyed out in SMSQL and SMSP is likely because either protection manager does not recognize the vault relationship, or the filers dont. Also check your data protection policy in protection manager. make sure the protection manager server, the server running snapmanager, and the storage controllers can all communicate. Check the volume status on both the source and destination. Look for full volumes, or volumes with a max number of snapshots (254).
I almost found the root casue.
It seems sharepoint automatically generate a new DB (performance*********) and deployed to storage by default. it's a little strange that LDF place is correct but MDF place is at system DB location. because SMSP job does not include this DB (no sync farm yet), then SMSP local backup works well. non-sharepoint MDF/LDF are at another seperate LUNs, so non-sharepoint DB SMSQL backup job is unimpacted.
but I don't know why it automatically unselected DB from dataset.
Tonight, we plan to migrate the DB to right place and check what will happen for backup archival seting