Hi All, My customer needs to rename all his Ontap clusters and also svm as there have a reference to cluster's name. Ha has a A400 metro cluster with Fabric Pool and the destination S3 buckets are on FAS2720. Actually we have ::> storage aggregate object-store config show -instance Name Server Container Name Provider Type Ipspace --------------- -------------------- -------------- ------------- ------------- NetApp1-S3-PROD-1 NetApp1-S3-PROD.xxx.fr netapp1-s3-prod-1-bucket-netapp1 ONTAP_S3 Default The svm NetApp1-S3-PROD needs to be renamed to DELTA-S3 and its name in DNS needs to be changed too. At the same time the object's name and Container's name need to be changed to refalect the new name. How can we do these changes without any trouble ?
... View more
Hi, trying to run VVol testing on laptop with the simulator and 9.6 (finshing off some old labs), have 99% of the software (apart from the API service) - looked on the site and I know its EOL. But I just wondered if anyone has the 'OnCommand API Services 2.2' All the links in the API dev network, just return back to the default support page.
... View more
Dear Community, We would like to set up a separate role for our trainees on our cluster. This role should - Enable read-only access to the entire cluster - Complete access to a dedicated Test_SVM that is available for training purposes It is often said, that this is not possible for a specific SVM, but there is even a KB article that can serve as a basis for this ("How to set up and configure RBAC in ONTAP to limit administrator access to specific volumes or SVMs" From <https://kb.netapp.com/on-prem/ontap/Ontap_OS/OS-KBs/How_to_set_up_and_configure_RBAC_in_ONTAP_to_limit_administrator_access_to_specific_volumes_or_SVMs#>) The problem with this, however, is that when creating the role for ’-cmddirname DEFAULT -access readonly’ for the special Test_SVM “readonly” is not possible, but “none” is always suggested: FASxxxxx::> security login role create role -role Restricted_Azubi_Role -cmddirname DEFAULT -access readonly -query ‘’ -vserver SVM_TESTxxxxx Error: command failed: The only valid value for access is ‘none’ for a Vserver role when the specified command directory is ‘DEFAULT’ FAS27501::> What am I doing wrong? Any ideas? Many thanks and best regards Michael
... View more
Hello, I’m seeking some clarification on the disk show command in NetApp ONTAP, specifically regarding the difference between physical and usable disk sizes across different NetApp models. I’ve observed that on AFF (All Flash FAS) models, the physical-size and usable-size values for disks are the same. However, on FAS (Fabric-Attached Storage) models, these values are different. Here are the details from the disk show command for both types of models: AFF Model netapp-c1::> disk show -fields physical-size,usable-size disk physical-size usable-size ------ ------------- ----------- 1.0.0 1.75TB 1.75TB 1.0.1 1.75TB 1.75TB 1.0.2 1.75TB 1.75TB 1.0.3 1.75TB 1.75TB 1.0.4 1.75TB 1.75TB 1.0.19 1.75TB 1.75TB 1.0.20 1.75TB 1.75TB 1.0.21 1.75TB 1.75TB 1.0.22 1.75TB 1.75TB 1.0.23 1.75TB 1.75TB 10 entries were displayed. FAS Model OnTapMulti::> disk show -fields physical-size,usable-size disk physical-size usable-size -------- ------------- ----------- NET-1.1 2.00TB 1.97TB NET-1.2 68.00GB 66.93GB NET-1.3 1023GB 1023GB NET-1.4 1023GB 1023GB NET-1.5 1023GB 1023GB NET-1.6 1023GB 1023GB NET-1.7 8.00GB 7.99GB NET-1.8 8.00GB 7.99GB NET-1.9 8.00GB 7.99GB NET-1.10 8.00GB 7.99GB 10 entries were displayed. Why are the physical-size and usable-size values the same for AFF model disks but different for FAS model disks? Thank You !
... View more