Hope you can help me in this case...
The Partner got a question, for which I couldn’t find any usable information.
ONTap API (v 1.31 cluster):
To the partner, these two values would be sort of in sync, as the lifetime of a ssd would also be related to the number of spares available.
So he had a look at it’s AFF systems
and see the following
Just a snippet. Some have higher spares used. But what the partner find it weird the wear percent . which is 0, but the spares used percent is 7 or more (on others) percent. Is this expected? Which number is leading? It seems also strange that the SSDs seem to use the spares at a consistent rate, as in, consistent usage across all the SSDs. Is this also expected behavior?
Any suggestion is welcome!