For any sort of system outage, please open a support ticket. Community support is typically for user issues or issues that are low priority.
... View more
Did you see the note on page 16: NOTE: Be aware this guide mixes examples of the VMnet8 on different subnets (192.168.23.0 above, 17.0 later on, etc) Are you using IP space suitable to your environment? The screenshot you provided isn't much help, at the same prompt can you please type "net int show" and provide the output of that?
... View more
I see you've gotten ample feedback on training providers, my response here is to suggest that you install the simulator in your virtual environment, get into the command line and start changing/breaking stuff. There's no better way to learn. Get to the command line, type a question mark, type the first command and then another question mark to see the parameters ad nauseam.
... View more
I guess this is a pre-emptive SOW, considering 9.8GA isn't out yet never mind P1? There's a lot of variables that go into scoping this upgrade, and while 12-16 hours definitely feels excessive, without context to what sort of surrounding effort is involved it wouldn't be fair to call this ludicrous yet. Is it your role to question the pricing of a statement of work? Sometimes management simply wants a throat to choke or finger to point and if no one in-house can do the upgrade, they often feel better if they pay more. If the system is heavily loaded it wouldn't be completely unheard of for an upgrade of an HA pair to take 4, maybe 6 hours. Then, is there any sort of verification testing being done, what about upgrades of OCUM/AiQUM, Snapcenter, or other support infrastructure? If it is your place to question the price, then perhaps you could request a Time & Materials SOW and not a fixed fee and have them report their hours. Or, shop the the upgrade around, surely there's other partners in your area who could provide a competing quote. Finally, the upgrade process in recent years has become quite easy and you should think about giving it a go yourself if you're concerned about the cost, but remember, now it is your throat that management gets to choke if it fails.
... View more
Not just v8+, I've had to do 3am change windows replacing the CF media gone bad in 7-mode gear...can't remember the exact model, ugly beige bezel with DS14's attached.
... View more
You really don't have to run ConfigAdvisor, it's only going to check for cabling errors and if this cluster has been running for a while, it's probably fine. However, it doesn't hurt to have it installed, so maybe proceed anyway.
Config Advisor does indeed connect to your systems directly, via ssh, but it will not provide an upgrade path. That path previously provided by TMAC is the right way to go.
... View more
I don't believe you're going to see much compression at all on either the TIFF or JPG files. TIFF files don't compress much, if at all and JPG are already compressed I believe. ONTAP can use either LZO Pro or GZIP compression algorithms, you could try compressing your files with utilities that use these same algorithms to determine compressibility. I think what you'll find is that the only way to compress these file types is at the expense of quality, typically people are keeping TIFF files because they want to retain quality. No storage company should tell you differently either.
... View more
I see in your original post a0b did not exist, but now the two ports, e2[a,b] are both in a0b. I don't think I'd try to the back-to-back connection while they're still in an ifgrp however, so you may wish to tear that down prior to that test.
Everything I see on the NetApp side looks good, at this point I'd check/try:
Replacing Fibre
Making sure it's multi-mode, assuming you're using SR SFP+s in a DC
Verifying SFP+ compatibility (SR vs. LR)
Verifying switch configuration
Just for completeness of information, maybe dump the output of ifgrp show -node <nodename> -ifgrp a0b -instance though at this point I'm pretty sure your side is fine, time to look at the physical stuff and the Cisco config.
... View more
I should have asked for this the first time, but how about:
net port show -node san-nap01-03 -port e2* -instance
To take the switch out of the equation, have you tried connecting e2a and e2b back-to-back?
... View more
I'm going to assume you've tried the obvious (to me) fixes of flipping the fibres in case of a TX/RX reversal as well as tried a new cable?
Assuming the above, can we get the following from the cluster:
net int show
net port show
And then the following from the Cisco:
show run int <relevant interface>
... View more
Head over to ActiveIQ, put in your serial number, then once you have the cluster in question open in AiQ, click on the "Upgrade Recommendation" near the top of the screen.
... View more
Are you using the same credentials you would typically use here? Because you need to use those. Also, does your OneCollect host have Internet access?
... View more
This information can be found in Hardware Universe, but I can tell you that the FAS8200 is indeed compatible with the latest versions of ONTAP. Hopefully you also checked that your rack is deep enough to support that DS460c.
... View more
Depending on your capcity requirements, be sure to also check out the AFF C190, but make sure you understand the limits around expansion.
... View more
Well Infinite Volumes are probalby not the path you want to go down since they have been deprecated in favour of FlexGroups, and as of 9.6 there is no in-place conversion. Talk to your local SE about this if you have a use case, perhaps the feature will gain traction and priority.
... View more
As SpindleNinja indicated, you'll have to recreate the IFGRP. If a0b has the correct VLAN(s) on it, migrate your LIFs form a0a to a0b, tear down a0a and rebuild from there. VLANs on top of IFGRPs are also a good idea, per SN.
... View more
To expand on what TMAC said, why not wait until 9.6 goes GA? Also, check out Upgrade Advisor inside of ActiveIQ, that'll help you with what you need to check before an upgrade.
... View more
Hi Tas,
The reason for this consistency requirement, which I believe is a soft-requirement, is for consitant performance across constituent volumes. When a FlexGroup is created, it provisions a multiple of constituent volumes across the aggegates it is allowed to consume from. If half of the FG is on NL-SAS and the other half is on SSD, access performance will vary wildly, depending on which constituent volume a file got written.
Since it appears all of your aggregates are going to be NL-SAS, I wouldn't be overly concerned about the differences between them, you likely won't notice much of a difference, if any.
... View more