Upgrade guide suggests "snapmirror quiesce". You probably can use wildcards, like in "snapmirror quiesce *", to suspend all relationships in all SVMs.
... View more
you first need to set the date\time and timezone to ensure the systems time is within 5 minutes of your domain controller Time zone is irrelevant; but quite a lot of people confuse computer time with wall clock time. This is true only as long as time zones are set identically indeed. All servers must have the same time when converted to UTC. IOW if server A is 3 hours east of Greenwich and has time 7pm and server B is 3 hours west of Greenwich and has time 1pm then both servers actually have the same time (4pm UTC time). Of course if someone now tries to "correct" time on server B by setting it to 7pm it becomes totally wrong.
... View more
You need to synchronize time between servers that are part of Windows domain (actually, Kerberos realm). It has really nothing to do with NetApp.
... View more
Online removal is supported only for completely unused shelves. What you are doing is effectively removing shelves from stack. Go figure ...
... View more
It's still complicated 🙂 I do not really know what combination of settings System Manager is using for "thick provisioned"; if we speak about space gurantee == volume and fractional reserve == 100% then you should always have enough space to (over-)write full LUN size.But note that under some conditions NetApp may not honor volume space gurantee ...
... View more
The answer is a bit complicated. In general, "thin provisioned" implies "no space reservation", so it may happen that volume runs out of space because it will be filled by other data (e.g. other LUN, snapshots etc). See TR-3483 for detailed description of LUN space management on NetApp. P.S. I edited reply and corrected TR number.
... View more
You are right of course. I do not know whay I was sure we need 8.1 source to perform 32 to 64 bit VSM; it is only reverse sync that requires it. Thank you!
... View more
Yes, that's possible. Do not forget, that in-place conversion without increasing aggregate size beyond 16T is officially supported starting with 8.2.1 if my memory serves me right.
... View more
An aggregate with the accompanying volumes in 7-mode are fully self described by the WAFL filesystem on the disks. In cDot, they are not. The cluster database, a copy of which is maintained on all nodes in the cluster, contains a ton of reference pointers as to what is where, what SVMs stuff belongs to, other relationship data, etc. That's not quite correct. Aggregate still contains enough information and there is tool to compare WAFL and VLDB and fix descrepances. May be this tool could even be used to introduce foreign aggregates and volumes into cluster. I do not have equipment to test it. There is no mechanism or utility that exists to map/merge 7-mode generic volumes into a cluster, building up the cDot metadata and ownership as you go. The question was how to move cDOT aggregate from one to another filer. At least that is how I understood it. Not how to import 7-Mode aggregate.
... View more
I am not aware of any way to move cDOT aggregate to a different filer. The only possibility is aggregate relocation, which effectively simply reassigns ownership to a partner in HA pair. This is one of features I really miss comparing with 7-Mode.
... View more
Look at https://kb.netapp.com/support/index?page=content&id=3012724 In particular Sessions established to NIS, LDAP, AD, WINS, DNS, NDMP, iSNS/Radius servers use any of the Data LIFs per vserver on the node.
... View more
Yes, I used CLI. I took a quick look, and System Manager does not offer e.g. policy type selection, but when you create Vault policy you get type=vault. I did not get any error when creating SnapVault relationship. It is possible that issue you had was with System Manager itself. Yes, both volumes in SnapVault relationship are of type DP. ... I made a quick test and yes, System Manager (in 8.3) still does not allow selecting another DP volume as source for Vault. I guess you will need to learn a couple of commands. Now when we know that documentation is incorrect, it is quite likely that all of this is already possible in 8.2. Looks like LoD still offers 8.2 lab; I'll get a look. ... No, it does not work in 8.2.x. What you can do, is explicitly transfer named snapshots, like snapmirror update ... -source-snapshot your-smvi-snapshot-name That works. Of course it means a bit of scripting around it, but it porvides workaround in case you cannot update to 8.3 for whatever reasons.
... View more
OK, I see the problem. Well, NetApp documentation for cDOT is extremely vague. Both 8.2 and 8.3 allow you to define snapshot policies with explicit snapmirror labels. OTOH both 8.2 and 8.3 state that Only these [sm_created] Snapshot copies are replicated from the mirror to the SnapVault backup. But then again - 8.3 defines three different types of snapmirror policies - async-mirror, mirror-vault and vault. The first two always include sm_created rule that cannot be removed; the latter does not have sm_created rule by default which makes me believe that in this case it is possible to transfer only named snapshots. Which of course requires as prerequisite that snapmirror labels are replicated from source to destination by SnapMirror (and NetApp is silent on this). I think your olnly option is to test it 🙂 Use simulator if you can; otherwise speak with your reseller and ask them to setup demo environment so you could test it. It does not really take long. Do you have access to LoD (Lab on Demand) by any chance? If you got any results I appreciate if you could post them. If I get time I may try to quick test it; I'll update it then.
... View more