Hi,
We really need help from any Guru on this topic.
According to our understanding of the KB on ocum management of relationships between vFilers (thanks to Kevin https://kb.netapp.com/support/index?page=content&id=3013156), we were supposing that ocum uses IP addresses available on physical storage systems and that it uses prefered IP addresses assigned to vFilers Units hosts in the same way it uses the physical storage systems ones.
We imported several external relationships without any problem (thanks to Adaikkappan https://communities.netapp.com/message/102548#102548)
Imports created and modified several entries in snapmirror.conf file on destination storage system.
OCUM created connections lines using the name and the preferred IP address of the vFilers: this is what we were expecting
A few examples from several storage systems:
- E2NAS001_E2NAS003=multi(10.203.xx.xx,10.203.xx.xx)
- FROFF001_FRFIL005_1363198327=multi(10.1.xx.xx,10.31.xx.xx)
- FRNAS004_FRFIL005_1363195793=multi(10.17.xx.xx,10.31.xx.xx)
- FRFIL005_FRNAS008_1363198591=multi(10.31.xx.xx,10.202.xx.xx)
Related relationships:
- E2NAS001_E2NAS003:xxx E2NAS003:xxx restart=always,connection_mode=inet 30 23 * *
- FROFF001_FRFIL005_1363198327:xxx E2NAS003:xxx restart=always,connection_mode=inet - - - -
- FRNAS004_FRFIL005_1363195793:xxx E2NAS003:xxx kbs=1000,restart=always,connection_mode=inet - - - -
- FRFIL005_FRNAS008_1363198591:xxx FRNAS008:xxx restart=always,connection_mode=inet - - - -
The first one is physical to physical
The second one is vFiler to vFiler
The third one is physical to vFiler
The fourth one is vFiler to physical
These results show that ocum is able to use prefered IP addresses defined for vFiler Units hosts and creates lines in snapmirror.conf accordingly.
Now, when we provision a new storage from scratch for a dataset with storage service attached and using the same storage systems and/or vFilers, the result is different.
In all cases ocum creates relationships using preferred IP addresses of hosting storage systems...
We do not understand why such differences exists. We think that something is missing in the configuration of dataset / storage service / policies ...
We will appreciate any help to make it working or explanation of this strange behaviour.
Many thanks