No, you cannot use both SAS ports. You need 2 bridges per loop on each site. ... View more

You can use FC-SAS bridge to utilize provider optical cabling. ... View more

No that’s not possible. All RG must be of the same type, either all RAID4 or all RAID_DP. ... View more

In general, it is recommended to assign whole loop to one controller. This is also prerequisite for automatic disk assignment. In practice loops are often shared, especially in small configurations or due to hardware limits. So the only practical drawback I can think of is that replacement disks need to be manually assigned. ... View more

Any link that does not require authentication? Отправлено с iPhone 05.02.2013, в 16:51, "Igor Stojnov" <xdl-communities@communities.netapp.com<mailto:xdl-communities@communities.netapp.com>> написал(а): <https://communities.netapp.com/index.jspa> Re: How to authentication FTP by Windows AD? created by Igor Stojnov<https://communities.netapp.com/people/igor%40osap.rs> in Products & Solutions - View the full discussion<https://communities.netapp.com/message/99619#99619> Here's a short discussion on the matter: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/Domain-user-FTPing-filer-751357.S.99760585 I experimented a bit with anonymous FTP and authentication via /etc/passwd (local account), but every variation in set parameters produced a different error. Reply to this message by replying to this email -or- go to the message on NetApp Community<https://communities.netapp.com/message/99619#99619> Start a new discussion in Products & Solutions by email<mailto:discussions-community-products_and_solutions@communities.netapp.com> or at NetApp Community<https://communities.netapp.com/choose-container.jspa?contentType=1&containerType=14&container=2068> ... View more

Yes, when using this CIFS setup option you are limited to plain text passwords. Отправлено с iPhone 29.01.2013, в 15:45, "David Beranek" <xdl-communities@communities.netapp.com<mailto:xdl-communities@communities.netapp.com>> написал(а): <https://communities.netapp.com/index.jspa> CIFS + OpenLDAP - Plaintext password created by David Beranek<https://communities.netapp.com/people/DAVIDBERANEK> in Products & Solutions - View the full discussion<https://communities.netapp.com/message/99214#99214> Hi all, I have problem with CIFS authentification from client to FAS2240-4 with Data Ontap 8.1.1. Storage to OpenLDAP. Comunication is ok, storage can read user information from OpenLDAP, but if client want login to CIFS share for communication must use plaintext password. Configuration without plaintext passwords cant authenticate me. Is it really necessary to use plainttext password? My CIFS configuration: WINS – OFF multiprotocol filer (4) /etc/passwd and/or NIS/LDAP authentication /etc/nsswitch.conf hosts: files dns passwd: ldap files netgroup: ldap files group: ldap files shadow: files nis Ldap config: ldap.ADdomain ldap.base ou=Users,dc=XX,dc=XX,dc=mycompany,dc= ldap.base.group ou=XX,ou=Groups,dc=XX,dc=XX,dc=XX,dc=XX ldap.base.netgroup ldap.base.passwd ou=Users,dc=XX,dc=XX,dc=XX,dc=XX ldap.enable on ldap.minimum_bind_level anonymous ldap.name cn=XX,ou=Special accounts,dc=XX,dc=XX,dc=XX,dc=XX ldap.nssmap.attribute.gecos gecos ldap.nssmap.attribute.gidNumber gidNumber ldap.nssmap.attribute.groupname cn ldap.nssmap.attribute.homeDirectory homeDirectory ldap.nssmap.attribute.loginShell loginShell ldap.nssmap.attribute.memberNisNetgroup memberNisNetgroup ldap.nssmap.attribute.memberUid memberUid ldap.nssmap.attribute.netgroupname cn ldap.nssmap.attribute.nisNetgroupTriple nisNetgroupTriple ldap.nssmap.attribute.uid uid ldap.nssmap.attribute.uidNumber uidNumber ldap.nssmap.attribute.userPassword userPassword ldap.nssmap.objectClass.nisNetgroup nisNetgroup ldap.nssmap.objectClass.posixAccount posixAccount ldap.nssmap.objectClass.posixGroup posixGroup ldap.passwd ****** ldap.port 389 ldap.servers XXX.XXX.XXX ldap.servers.preferred XXX.XXX.XXX ldap.ssl.enable off ldap.timeout 20 ldap.usermap.attribute.unixaccount unixaccount ldap.usermap.attribute.windowsaccount windowsaccount ldap.usermap.base ldap.usermap.enable off Cifs config: cifs.LMCompatibilityLevel 1 cifs.W2K_password_change off cifs.W2K_password_change_interval 4w cifs.W2K_password_change_within 3600h cifs.audit.account_mgmt_events.enable off cifs.audit.autosave.file.extension timestamp cifs.audit.autosave.file.limit 0 cifs.audit.autosave.onsize.enable off cifs.audit.autosave.onsize.threshold 75% cifs.audit.autosave.ontime.enable on cifs.audit.autosave.ontime.interval 1d cifs.audit.enable on cifs.audit.file_access_events.enable on cifs.audit.liveview.allowed_users cifs.audit.liveview.enable off cifs.audit.logon_events.enable on cifs.audit.logsize 1048576 cifs.audit.nfs.enable off cifs.audit.nfs.filter.filename cifs.audit.saveas /etc/log/adtlog.evt cifs.bypass_traverse_checking on cifs.client.dup-detection ip-address cifs.comment cifs.enable_share_browsing on cifs.gpo.enable off cifs.gpo.trace.enable off cifs.grant_implicit_exe_perms off cifs.guest_account cifs.home_dir_namestyle cifs.home_dirs_public_for_admin on cifs.idle_timeout 1800 cifs.ipv6.enable off cifs.max_mpx 253 cifs.ms_snapshot_mode pre-xp cifs.netbios_aliases cifs.netbios_over_tcp.enable on cifs.nfs_root_ignore_acl off cifs.oplocks.enable on cifs.oplocks.opendelta 0 cifs.per_client_stats.enable off cifs.perfmon.allowed_users cifs.perm_check_ro_del_ok off cifs.perm_check_use_gid on cifs.preserve_unix_security off cifs.restrict_anonymous 0 cifs.restrict_anonymous.enable off cifs.save_case on cifs.scopeid cifs.search_domains cifs.show_dotfiles on cifs.show_snapshot off cifs.shutdown_msg_level 2 cifs.sidcache.enable on cifs.sidcache.lifetime 1440 cifs.signing.enable on cifs.smb2.client.enable on cifs.smb2.enable on cifs.smb2.signing.required off cifs.smb2_1.branch_cache.enable off cifs.smb2_1.branch_cache.hash_time_out 3600 (value might be overwritten in takeover) cifs.snapshot_file_folding.enable off cifs.symlinks.cycleguard on cifs.symlinks.enable on cifs.trace_dc_connection off cifs.trace_login off cifs.universal_nested_groups.enable on cifs.widelink.ttl 10m Reply to this message by replying to this email -or- go to the message on NetApp Community<https://communities.netapp.com/message/99214#99214> Start a new discussion in Products & Solutions by email<mailto:discussions-community-products_and_solutions@communities.netapp.com> or at NetApp Community<https://communities.netapp.com/choose-container.jspa?contentType=1&containerType=14&container=2068> ... View more

Some filesystems (e.g. Ext4) support it natively. There is also fstrim command for on-demand space reclamation. Отправлено с iPhone 22.01.2013, в 8:12, "Darren Kimber" <xdl-communities@communities.netapp.com<mailto:xdl-communities@communities.netapp.com>> написал(а): <https://communities.netapp.com/index.jspa> Does SnapDrive for UNIX support Space Reclamation? created by Darren Kimber<https://communities.netapp.com/people/kimbd> in Host Side Data Management - View the full discussion<https://communities.netapp.com/message/98722#98722> Does anyone know if SnapDrive for UNIX (all flavours) supports Space Reclamation or only the Windows versions does? Cheers Darren Reply to this message by replying to this email -or- go to the message on NetApp Community<https://communities.netapp.com/message/98722#98722> Start a new discussion in Host Side Data Management by email<mailto:discussions-community-products_and_solutions-host_side_data_management@communities.netapp.com> or at NetApp Community<https://communities.netapp.com/choose-container.jspa?contentType=1&containerType=14&container=2280> ... View more

Try using eccentric to display information about your user before and after you did password login. When using public key, there is no way to verify your user. I suspect, logging in using password caches login information for later use. Using GSS-API with Kerberos may provide a solution if filer supports it. Отправлено с iPhone 21.01.2013, в 20:00, "STO DC Storage" <xdl-communities@communities.netapp.com<mailto:xdl-communities@communities.netapp.com>> написал(а): <https://communities.netapp.com/index.jspa> Re: ssh as a domainuser to filer / rsa pubkey in cygwin created by STO DC Storage<https://communities.netapp.com/people/sto.dc.storage> in Data ONTAP - View the full discussion<https://communities.netapp.com/message/98679#98679> I'am running against the same problem every day. I add my ssh-key in pageant and try a 'ssh filer date' and it states: : User 'win\user' denied access - missing required capability: 'cli-date' Now I remove my ssh key from pageant and run the same command again and it asks for my password (which I expect it to do). It grants me access and executes the command 'date'. Somewhere on the road it now can identify me as 'win\user' and sees that I'am allowed to execute the command. I then add my ssh-key again in pageant. Execute the command again and voila, the command works. I have to do above sequence every day, for some reason the filer resets my credentials every day. I have several filers to manage, but only one gives me this behaviour. I searched through all options and files but I can't see any difference. Do you have any clue? Reply to this message by replying to this email -or- go to the message on NetApp Community<https://communities.netapp.com/message/98679#98679> Start a new discussion in Data ONTAP by email<mailto:discussions-community-products_and_solutions-data_ontap@communities.netapp.com> or at NetApp Community<https://communities.netapp.com/choose-container.jspa?contentType=1&containerType=14&container=2877> ... View more

The problem is, as soon as you unmap real LUN 0 it is replaced by pseudo LUNZ. Having LUN 0 is a must for SCSI. Now how will NetApp react to LUN that suddenly changed all its properties? Отправлено с iPhone 17.01.2013, в 20:40, "billshaffer" <xdl-communities@communities.netapp.com<mailto:xdl-communities@communities.netapp.com>> написал(а): <https://communities.netapp.com/index.jspa> Re: V-Series and LUN 0 created by billshaffer<https://communities.netapp.com/people/billshaffer> in V-Series - View the full discussion<https://communities.netapp.com/message/98494#98494> For what it's worth, we had lun0 mapped and used for years in my old environment with no issues (set up this way by the PS guys, and by the time I saw the note not to use lun 0 it was too late). This was a V3020 running various versions of ontap 6, 7 and 8.0 against HDS USP-V. It also worked on a V3240 with ontap 8.0 against HDS VSP. Never saw a problem. Bill Reply to this message by replying to this email -or- go to the message on NetApp Community<https://communities.netapp.com/message/98494#98494> Start a new discussion in V-Series by email<mailto:discussions-community-products_and_solutions-storage_systems-v--series@communities.netapp.com> or at NetApp Community<https://communities.netapp.com/choose-container.jspa?contentType=1&containerType=14&container=2276> ... View more

Root password can be reset only from console; you need to reboot filer and interrupt booting to enter special menu (it prompts you after loading kernel). If there is some other user with sufficient privileges and known password, you can use it to reset root password online. ... View more

What is not clear here, was write request retried or data is lost. Отправлено с iPhone 15.01.2013, в 20:43, "Martin Fisher" <xdl-communities@communities.netapp.com<mailto:xdl-communities@communities.netapp.com>> написал(а): <https://communities.netapp.com/index.jspa> Re: Volume autogrow and message "Write failed due to lack of space" created by Martin Fisher<https://communities.netapp.com/people/martin.fisher> in Data ONTAP - View the full discussion<https://communities.netapp.com/message/98288#98288> Hi - The syslog/console messages are showing that ONTAP is trying to write the data to the LUN as normal, but cant strip the data down due to insufficient space. ONTAP/WAFL then increases the size of the volume with the autogrown parameters set so it could continue service. If these were not set and the LUN ran out of space, the LUN would be auto dismounted to protect and preserve the data existing in the LUN. One way to test this, if you are unsure is turn off all the autogrow settings and start writing data to the LUN. martin Reply to this message by replying to this email -or- go to the message on NetApp Community<https://communities.netapp.com/message/98288#98288> Start a new discussion in Data ONTAP by email<mailto:discussions-community-products_and_solutions-data_ontap@communities.netapp.com> or at NetApp Community<https://communities.netapp.com/choose-container.jspa?contentType=1&containerType=14&container=2877> ... View more

Yes, root aggregate must be mirrored, otherwise no takeover can happen if site is lost. You are correct, with hardware based disk ownership each filer owns whole shelf. ... View more

The only other way is to map share and backup it from client. Also, for NDMP you do not always need tape, attached to filer. Most backup software I know supports three way NDMP backup, when data stream is sent to media server (tape server) via LAN. Отправлено с iPhone 09.01.2013, в 21:20, "Jim Raykowski" <xdl-communities@communities.netapp.com<mailto:xdl-communities@communities.netapp.com>> написал(а): <https://communities.netapp.com/index.jspa> Re: Backuping up CIFS Shares created by Jim Raykowski<https://communities.netapp.com/people/JRAYKOWSKI> in Products & Solutions - View the full discussion<https://communities.netapp.com/message/97917#97917> I have a requirement to tape out everyday so I need to backup these shares. Is there another way besides using NDMP? TIA, Jim Reply to this message by replying to this email -or- go to the message on NetApp Community<https://communities.netapp.com/message/97917#97917> Start a new discussion in Products & Solutions by email<mailto:discussions-community-products_and_solutions@communities.netapp.com> or at NetApp Community<https://communities.netapp.com/choose-container.jspa?contentType=1&containerType=14&container=2068> ... View more

There is no way to present CIFS shares as iSCSI LUN. Snapshots provide quite efficient backup for file shares. Отправлено с iPhone 09.01.2013, в 20:28, "Jim Raykowski" <xdl-communities@communities.netapp.com<mailto:xdl-communities@communities.netapp.com>> написал(а): <https://communities.netapp.com/index.jspa> Backuping up CIFS Shares created by Jim Raykowski<https://communities.netapp.com/people/JRAYKOWSKI> in Products & Solutions - View the full discussion<https://communities.netapp.com/message/97915#97915> Hello, We brought a new FAS-2240 online starting in December and I have been working to move it into production and so far so good. I have FC LUNs and CIFS Shares up and running in a test production environment and it is working as advertised. The next hurdle is backups. I have been reading over come of the posts here and it seems that unless we use NDMP to backup data the only other option would be to present the CIFS Shares as iSCSI LUNs as well to the backup server as new disks and conduct backups that way. Are there any issues with presenting active CIFS shares as iSCSI LUNS as well? In most situation all iSCSI activity will take place after roduction hours and it is just being used to copy data for backups purposes. TIA Jim Reply to this message by replying to this email -or- go to the message on NetApp Community<https://communities.netapp.com/message/97915#97915> Start a new discussion in Products & Solutions by email<mailto:discussions-community-products_and_solutions@communities.netapp.com> or at NetApp Community<https://communities.netapp.com/choose-container.jspa?contentType=1&containerType=14&container=2068> ... View more

That's correct. If you cannot upgrade you need to spare this disk under Data ONTAP version that understands disk label. Отправлено с iPhone 08.01.2013, в 22:03, "bheusmann" <xdl-communities@communities.netapp.com<mailto:xdl-communities@communities.netapp.com>> написал(а): <https://communities.netapp.com/index.jspa> Re: disk 0b.65 has an unsupported label version created by bheusmann<https://communities.netapp.com/people/bheusmann> in Storage Systems - View the full discussion<https://communities.netapp.com/message/97834#97834> Actually, hold the phone. I now remember why I have not upgraded to ONTAP 7.3.7. The 3 original shelf's are DS14 MK2 FC with ESH modules that are NOT supported after ONTAP 7.2.x The new shelf's are DS14 MK2 AT with AT-FCX modules installed. So with this new information, is the best course of action to try and find a filer that has been excessed and possibly available, setup and installed with ONTAP 7.3.7, reclaim and then unassign all the disks to unowned then attempt to re-attach to the FAS3020 running ONTAP 7.2.7 and assign the disks? If sucessful, this would allow the new aggregrate to be created, and the current data migrated to the new shelf's, removing the ESH shelf's and then upgrading the ONTAP of the filer with the new supported shelf's installed? Thanks. -BH Reply to this message by replying to this email -or- go to the message on NetApp Community<https://communities.netapp.com/message/97834#97834> Start a new discussion in Storage Systems by email<mailto:discussions-community-products_and_solutions-storage_systems@communities.netapp.com> or at NetApp Community<https://communities.netapp.com/choose-container.jspa?contentType=1&containerType=14&container=2878> ... View more

The only way to resolve this issue is to either put disk in a system with 7.3 and make it zeroed spare or upgrade to 7.3. Is there any specific reason to stay with 7.2? Отправлено с iPhone 08.01.2013, в 20:40, "bheusmann" <xdl-communities@communities.netapp.com<mailto:xdl-communities@communities.netapp.com>> написал(а): <https://communities.netapp.com/index.jspa> disk 0b.65 has an unsupported label version created by bheusmann<https://communities.netapp.com/people/bheusmann> in Storage Systems - View the full discussion<https://communities.netapp.com/message/97828#97828> I'm having an issue adding a 2 shelf's to my FAS3020 filer. There were 2 issues, one being a bad SFP but that was replaced and the fiber channel adapters are all online now. The second and more frustrating issues is the unsupported raid label I'm getting when trying to assign the disks to the filer. The shelves were taken from DECOMM excess inventory to be re-purposed increasing the storage capacity of the SAN in the test lab. The existing data from LUN01 on shelf's 1-3 are to be migrated to a new aggregate and LUN on shelf's 4 & 5. One of the new shelf's was properly removed and all disks unassigned from it's originating filer. The second shelf was however, not this lucky. The disks were not unassigned prior to being placed in excess. It appears that only 2 of the disks in the shelf have been assigned successfully to the filer as spares. The originating filer was running ONTAP 7.3.7 and the current filer in the lab is running ONTAP 7.2.7. Can anyone provide information or some help to resolve this issue? I'm at the end of my rope and none of the troubleshooting I've done seem to be working. I've tried to assign in maintenance mode, fail the disk, unown and reassign, etc. etc. etc. This system is not under NetApp support. This is a production filer, but it can be halted for maintenance. The ONTAP version can also be upgraded to 7.3.7 if that will help resolve any issues. It's a standalone filer, no HA or redundant filers supporting the data sources. Any requested confing outputs can be posted. Thanks. -BH Reply to this message by replying to this email -or- go to the message on NetApp Community<https://communities.netapp.com/message/97828#97828> Start a new discussion in Storage Systems by email<mailto:discussions-community-products_and_solutions-storage_systems@communities.netapp.com> or at NetApp Community<https://communities.netapp.com/choose-container.jspa?contentType=1&containerType=14&container=2878> ... View more

So this is fabric ? Initial mail had "stretch" in subject ... Then you need indeed two or four pairs depending on traffic isolation Отправлено с iPhone 04.01.2013, в 22:03, "RICCO4400" <xdl-communities@communities.netapp.com<mailto:xdl-communities@communities.netapp.com>> написал(а): <https://communities.netapp.com/index.jspa> Re: Fabric Metrocluster - How many dark fibres? created by RICCO4400<https://communities.netapp.com/people/RICCO4400> in Data ONTAP - View the full discussion<https://communities.netapp.com/message/97697#97697> Hi Willybobs27 If you plan to implement TI zone (Traffic Isolation) you need 4 fiber, if not 2 can be enough Have a look to TR3548 if you want more information about TI Zone Regard Reply to this message by replying to this email -or- go to the message on NetApp Community<https://communities.netapp.com/message/97697#97697> Start a new discussion in Data ONTAP by email<mailto:discussions-community-products_and_solutions-data_ontap@communities.netapp.com> or at NetApp Community<https://communities.netapp.com/choose-container.jspa?contentType=1&containerType=14&container=2877> ... View more

You need dark fibre for each remote shelf connection as well as for FC-VI port. This amounts to two optical pairs for each stack. As stacks should be mirrored, minimum that makes sense is 6 optical pairs between sites. Отправлено с iPhone 04.01.2013, в 20:16, "Willybobs27" <xdl-communities@communities.netapp.com<mailto:xdl-communities@communities.netapp.com>> написал(а): <https://communities.netapp.com/index.jspa> Stretch Metrocluster - How many dark fibres? created by Willybobs27<https://communities.netapp.com/people/Willybobs27> in Data ONTAP - View the full discussion<https://communities.netapp.com/message/97679#97679> I've looked at various bits of documentation and some suggest 2 dark fibre's, one for each fabric, whilst others show 4 dark fibre's one for each fabric and 2 for the FCVI cluster interconnects. Which one is correct? Reply to this message by replying to this email -or- go to the message on NetApp Community<https://communities.netapp.com/message/97679#97679> Start a new discussion in Data ONTAP by email<mailto:discussions-community-products_and_solutions-data_ontap@communities.netapp.com> or at NetApp Community<https://communities.netapp.com/choose-container.jspa?contentType=1&containerType=14&container=2877> ... View more

No, you do not. Same as you do not need the same disk configuration Отправлено с iPhone 28.12.2012, в 20:04, "Sean Tracy" <xdl-communities@communities.netapp.com<mailto:xdl-communities@communities.netapp.com>> написал(а): <https://communities.netapp.com/index.jspa> Re: Flash Pool SSD on FAS3240 created by Sean Tracy<https://communities.netapp.com/people/SEANTRACY> in Products & Solutions - View the full discussion<https://communities.netapp.com/message/97446#97446> My understanding is you need the same amount of SSD's on each head of a HA pair. Reply to this message by replying to this email -or- go to the message on NetApp Community<https://communities.netapp.com/message/97446#97446> Start a new discussion in Products & Solutions by email<mailto:discussions-community-products_and_solutions@communities.netapp.com> or at NetApp Community<https://communities.netapp.com/choose-container.jspa?contentType=1&containerType=14&container=2068> ... View more