VMware Solutions Discussions
VMware Solutions Discussions
Hello, guys.
In our company we have a NetApp FAS 6040 release 8.0RC3 7-Mode.
More recently, there was a problem with configuring autosupport. When you try to change settings, turn off, turn on - nothing happens and mistakes occur:
netapp02> options autosupport
autosupport.cifs.verbose off
option autosupport.content: can not be read, connection problem (code=0xffffffff)
autosupport.content unknown (value might be overwritten in takeover)
option autosupport.doit: can not be read, connection problem (code=0xffffffff)
autosupport.doit unknown
option autosupport.enable: can not be read, connection problem (code=0xffffffff)
autosupport.enable unknown (value might be overwritten in takeover)
option autosupport.from: can not be read, connection problem (code=0xffffffff)
autosupport.from unknown (value might be overwritten in takeover)
option autosupport.local.nht_data.enable: can not be read, connection problem (code=0xffffffff)
autosupport.local.nht_data.enable unknown (value might be overwritten in takeover)
option autosupport.local.performance_data.enable: can not be read, connection problem (code=0xffffffff)
autosupport.local.performance_data.enable unknown (value might be overwritten in takeover)
option autosupport.mailhost: can not be read, connection problem (code=0xffffffff)
autosupport.mailhost unknown (value might be overwritten in takeover)
option autosupport.minimal.subject.id: can not be read, connection problem (code=0xffffffff)
autosupport.minimal.subject.id unknown (value might be overwritten in takeover)
option autosupport.enable: can not be read, connection problem (code=0xffffffff)
option autosupport.nht_data.enable: can not be read, connection problem (code=0xffffffff)
autosupport.nht_data.enable unknown (value might be overwritten in takeover)
option autosupport.enable: can not be read, connection problem (code=0xffffffff)
option autosupport.noteto: can not be read, connection problem (code=0xffffffff)
autosupport.noteto unknown (value might be overwritten in takeover)
option autosupport.from: can not be read, connection problem (code=0xffffffff)
option autosupport.partner.to: can not be read, connection problem (code=0xffffffff)
autosupport.partner.to unknown (value might be overwritten in takeover)
option autosupport.support.proxy: can not be read, connection problem (code=0xffffffff)
option autosupport.performance_data.doit: can not be read, connection problem (code=0xffffffff)
autosupport.performance_data.doit unknown
option autosupport.support.transport: can not be read, connection problem (code=0xffffffff)
option autosupport.performance_data.enable: can not be read, connection problem (code=0xffffffff)
autosupport.performance_data.enable unknown (value might be overwritten in takeover)
option autosupport.retry.count: can not be read, connection problem (code=0xffffffff)
autosupport.retry.count unknown (value might be overwritten in takeover)
option autosupport.retry.interval: can not be read, connection problem (code=0xffffffff)
autosupport.retry.interval unknown (value might be overwritten in takeover)
option autosupport.support.enable: can not be read, connection problem (code=0xffffffff)
autosupport.support.enable unknown (value might be overwritten in takeover)
option autosupport.support.proxy: can not be read, connection problem (code=0xffffffff)
autosupport.support.proxy unknown (value might be overwritten in takeover)
option autosupport.support.to: can not be read, connection problem (code=0xffffffff)
autosupport.support.to unknown (value might be overwritten in takeover)
option autosupport.support.transport: can not be read, connection problem (code=0xffffffff)
autosupport.support.transport unknown (value might be overwritten in takeover)
option autosupport.support.url: can not be read, connection problem (code=0xffffffff)
autosupport.support.url unknown (value might be overwritten in takeover)
option autosupport.throttle: can not be read, connection problem (code=0xffffffff)
autosupport.throttle unknown (value might be overwritten in takeover)
option autosupport.to: can not be read, connection problem (code=0xffffffff)
autosupport.to unknown (value might be overwritten in takeover)
All this only happens on one controller, but a second controller is operating normally allows you to change settings autosupport as it should.
Does anyone can offer ideas?
Hi ucellcoscom
Please post messages from /etc/messages
If you don't know how read messages ---> rdfile /etc/messages or \\name_filer\etc$\
Thanks
Hello ucellcoscom
1. Please check next configuration on your filer
autosupport.content [complete | minimal] - Controls the content in AutoSupport message. Default is complete.
autosupport.doit [message] - It helps to send AutoSupport message immediately with specified message as subject.It can be used to validate the AutoSupport configuration.
autosupport.sender [ from ] -Defines the specified user as sender
autosupport.mailhost [host1,..,host5] -Defines mail host names
autosupport.minimal.subject.id [hostname|systemid] -Defines the system identification in message title
autosupport.support.transport [http | https | smtp ] -Defines the AutoSupport message delivery method
autosupport.support.to - Indicates where AutoSupport notifications to NetApp are sent if autosupport.support.transport is smtp. This is a read-only option.
2.Check to see if the file spool area (located in /etc/log/autosupport on a filer, /logs/autosupport on a NetCache) is full, or if the acls/permissions on the file spool area or the autosupport messages subdirectory (the autosupport message directories have .files as an extension), are blocking access. If the spool area is full, you are free to delete any subdirectories that do not have associated transmission flag files (files with .smtp or .post extensions.)
For additional information please see http://www.wafl.co.uk/autosupport/
Thanks
Thank you for your reply.
Under item 1 - see the first post. Commands do not work.
Under item 2:
Filesystem total used avail capacity Mounted on
/vol/vol0/ 264GB 11GB 253GB 4% /vol/vol0/
Permission to vol0 nobody changed.
By the way, I found that some commands are also not working. For example:
netapp02> options timed.servers 192.168.55.33
Could not delete timed servers
Could not set timed server 192.168.55.33.
What could this mean?
Hello ucellcoscom
Please delete all files and folder /etc/log/autosupport
Thanks
Hello ucellcoscom
Please check smtp server settings.On smtp server must be open smtp relay for IP addresses filers.
Thanks
Did you ever find the fix for this? I'm experiencing the exact same issue and support isn't being too helpful.
It was a stupid problem. I am very ashamed, but Default Gateway was entered incorrectly.
Default Gateway settings was wrong.
Hi there, I also saw this problem when the losk interface IP address was changed from 127.0.20.1 to 127.0.20.2 in order to get VMware Site Recovery Manager working ! I've raised a call with IBM support (I'm using an Nseries) because if I fix the VMware SRM problem, autosupport and timed options break ! Incidentally, my default route is fine.
Hi Neil,
I too have had to amend the losk interface IP on our NetApp filers to enable SRM. As you would expect I am now getting issues with autosupport and timed options. Did you ever get a response/resolution to your support ticket?
Cheers,
Pete
HI Pete,
yes I got an answer to my problem, it was down to the way we had registered the filers within SRM. The full answer can be found via the following post: http://communities.netapp.com/message/50685#50685
If for some reason you can't get to it, let me know and I'll cut and paste the contents into this post.
I was pretty pleased with the result, basically you don't have to change the losk interface so autosupport doesn't get broken, you just have to add information about the NFS interface when configuring SRM (even if you aren't using it !!).
Let me know how you get on.
All the best, Neil.
Hi Neil,
Many thanks...I had seen your other post but obviously misread it All sorted now although the filer has developed the original problem in this post, gateway is correct so hopefully a reboot will fix it.
Once again many thanks for all your help.
Cheers,
Pete
All - We had the same issue,
FAS3240 cluster
8.0.1P2
miafile0X*> Mon Aug 814:09:55 EDT [miafile0X: asup.smtp.host:info]: AutoSupport cannot connect tohost 10.10.X.X (Network is unreachable) for message: HA Group Notificationfrom miafile0X (USER_TRIGGERED (20023731)) INFO
Mon Aug 8 14:09:55 EDT[miafile0X: asup.smtp.retry:info]: AutoSupport mail (HA Group Notification frommiafile0X (USER_TRIGGERED (20023731)) INFO) was not sent for host (0). Thesystem will retry later to send the message
After working with NetApp support for 1 month the only cure was a reboot of the filer.
In spite of checking everything over the 4 weeks or so of this issue, a planned failover to the partner, then a reboot, cleared it all up.
There must have been some hidden routing issue.
Another one problem with autosupport .
My filer can't send Autosupport "Weekly_log", but standart autosupport messages (for example: about failed disks or Performance Data) sent normally. It affected on "My Autosupport" on NetApp support Web-site. I can't see properties of my system.
In messages file i see that messages:
Sun May 20 00:12:29 UZT [netapp01: asup.general.file.create.failed:error]: AutoSupport file (/etc/log/autosupport/201205200004.0.files/201205200004.0.ems.gz) was unable to be written to the file spool subdirectory.
Sun May 20 00:12:29 UZT [netapp01: asup.general.file.create.failed:error]: AutoSupport file (/etc/log/autosupport/201205200004.0.files/201205200004.0.ems.gz) was unable to be written to the file spool subdirectory.
Sun May 20 00:12:29 UZT [netapp01: asup.general.file.create.failed:error]: AutoSupport file (/etc/log/autosupport/201205200004.0.files/201205200004.0.rc.gz) was unable to be written to the file spool subdirectory.
Sun May 20 00:12:29 UZT [netapp01: asup.general.file.create.failed:error]: AutoSupport file (/etc/log/autosupport/201205200004.0.files/201205200004.0.rc.gz) was unable to be written to the file spool subdirectory.
Sun May 20 00:12:29 UZT [netapp01: asup.general.file.create.failed:error]: AutoSupport file (/etc/log/autosupport/201205200004.0.files/201205200004.0.exports.gz) was unable to be written to the file spool subdirectory.
Sun May 20 00:12:29 UZT [netapp01: asup.general.file.create.failed:error]: AutoSupport file (/etc/log/autosupport/201205200004.0.files/201205200004.0.exports.gz) was unable to be written to the file spool subdirectory.
Sun May 20 00:12:29 UZT [netapp01: asup.general.file.create.failed:error]: AutoSupport file (/etc/log/autosupport/201205200004.0.files/201205200004.0.hosts.gz) was unable to be written to the file spool subdirectory.
Sun May 20 00:12:29 UZT [netapp01: asup.general.file.create.failed:error]: AutoSupport file (/etc/log/autosupport/201205200004.0.files/201205200004.0.hosts.gz) was unable to be written to the file spool subdirectory.
Sun May 20 00:12:29 UZT [netapp01: asup.general.file.create.failed:error]: AutoSupport file (/etc/log/autosupport/201205200004.0.files/201205200004.0.resolv_conf.gz) was unable to be written to the file spool subdirectory.
Here output of some command from filer.
netapp01> df -k /vol/vol0/
Filesystem total used avail capacity Mounted on
/vol/vol0/ 277848424KB 16997756KB 260850668KB 6% /vol/vol0/
/vol/vol0/.snapshot 69462104KB 2283416KB 67178688KB 3% /vol/vol0/.snapshot
netapp01> exportfs
/vol/vol0/home -sec=sys,rw,nosuid
/vol/vol0 -sec=sys,rw=x.x.x.x,anon=0,nosuid
notes: x.x.x.x - IP address of server from which i can mount vol0 for upload disk firmware e.c.t
netapp01> options autosupport
autosupport.cifs.verbose off
autosupport.content complete (value might be overwritten in takeover)
autosupport.doit WEEKLY_LOG
autosupport.enable on (value might be overwritten in takeover)
autosupport.from myfiler@mydomain.x (value might be overwritten in takeover)
autosupport.local.nht_data.enable off (value might be overwritten in takeover)
autosupport.local.performance_data.enable off (value might be overwritten in takeover)
autosupport.mailhost x.x.x.x (value might be overwritten in takeover)
autosupport.minimal.subject.id hostname (value might be overwritten in takeover)
autosupport.nht_data.enable on (value might be overwritten in takeover)
autosupport.noteto "" (value might be overwritten in takeover)
autosupport.partner.to my.mail@mydomain.x (value might be overwritten in takeover)
autosupport.performance_data.doit DONT
autosupport.performance_data.enable on (value might be overwritten in takeover)
autosupport.retry.count 15 (value might be overwritten in takeover)
autosupport.retry.interval 4m (value might be overwritten in takeover)
autosupport.support.enable on (value might be overwritten in takeover)
autosupport.support.proxy off (value might be overwritten in takeover)
autosupport.support.to autosupport@netapp.com (value might be overwritten in takeover)
autosupport.support.transport smtp (value might be overwritten in takeover)
autosupport.support.url support.netapp.com/asupprod/post/1.0/postAsup (value might be overwritten in takeover)
autosupport.throttle on (value might be overwritten in takeover)
autosupport.to my.mail@mydomain.x (value might be overwritten in takeover)
netapp01>
notes: my.mail@mydomain.x - my corporate e-mail address, x.x.x.x - ip address of our mailhost, myfiler@mydomain.x - address in field "From" in autosupport mail
What is your opinion?
Does this KB help?
Hello, Andrey! Thank you for helping!
netapp01> qtree status vol0
Volume Tree Style Oplocks Status
-------- -------- ----- -------- ---------
vol0 unix enabled normal
netapp01> qtree security /vol/vol0
/vol/vol0/ has unix security style and oplocks are enabled.
netapp01> options cifs.ntfs_ignore_unix_security_ops
cifs.ntfs_ignore_unix_security_ops off
If It really needed, I will switch it to ON and i will post here about result this operation.
This option affects only NTFS security style.
Which version of Data ONTAP are you using?
netapp01> version
NetApp Release 8.0RC3 7-Mode
That’s really old. The bug is marked as fixed in 8.0P release (do not remember exact P number) and current 8.0 version is 8.0.3P1. I would strongly consider updating.