Hi all, to setup a supported version of Ontap Select I've found that there are a set of too much strict hardware prerequisites. But I can understand to avoid poor performance Select instances. But this I don't understand at all: ONTAP Select is supported on VMware Vsphere Enterprise or Enterprise+ license only. ONTAP Select is a virtual storage appliance and requires certain capabilities from the underlying hypervisor. You would need either Vsphere Enterprise or Enterprise+ license Why Enterprise or Enterprise+? Imagine to use a Select on a branch office in my experience I've never met customer using such high license for their small vSphere cluster on a peripheral site. Why to not let me the choice to install a single node (or a multinode also) version of Select on a simple ESXi free hypervisor? Or on a standard edition of vSphere? Regards,
... View more
Hi all, we're planning to setup a limited version of Ontap Select single node for demo and study purpose. I've read that minimum disk to have in the ESXi host is 8 and that there are 2 TB plus 266 GB needed. I don't have free servers with all that resources. Is that a must have or can I setup Select also on a 4-5 disks ESXi host with less space on the Raid5 volume prepared? Regards,
... View more
I did not remember that old SANScreen option and I know that license is TB based. But customer told me that his installation stop to acquire informations on switches because they've surpassed the 12 port for TB limit. This is not what he expected to happen considering that TB raw is the only licensed limit. Bye
... View more
Hi everybody, starting from 7.x OCI release in documentation I cannot find any limit to the number of FC ports that can be inventoried. But in "setup" interface on GUI I can read: "License allows 12 ports per TB". For which I know there's just a capacitive license based on TB raw of storage acquired by the DS a/o RAU. And that's all. A big customer with thousands of FC ports on the territory and that has reached that limit reported me that they need some "special" license, is it? If license is TB based why there's this limit for FC ports? Regards,
... View more
Yes, my question came for I read that paragraph and that "completely unaware" let me think that I can have a choice to install it on a VSAN. Anyway it seems that support for VSAN is in the road map for Select. Thanks
... View more
Hi, assuming that a customer has a ready architecture based on a VMware VSAN datastore (that's a common VMFS datastore). Is it possibile to deploy the OVA of Select on that? Or does the NetApp software assumes to find a VMFS from a RAID on local disk? My opinion is that it should work, after all (see pic) the vmdk of Select have to stand on a VMFS. In case it works, is it also supported? Regards,
... View more
Hi Matt! I was sure that you'd answer. Here all is well, as I hope you've got a nice trip in my country. So, basically, the answer is that it could be a connector and this must be built using the available 7.2.x Connect API? Is it? I'll write you and email for details. Regards
... View more
Hi everybody, Last OCI version, 7.2.x I don't remember or find any docs about uCMDB from HP connecort or connections to exchange infos. The only connection I knew is for BMC. I've found an old doc from HP speaking about an "how to discover". First question: is HP software that connects to OCI pulling infos from it or is OCI that connect HP and pull infos? Second. If a connections is possibile is this made using API, "self made software" and so on? Regards,
... View more
Hi all, is there something in roadmap that will let use ADP in AFF systems used in a MetroCluster configurations? Thinking to a simple two node 8020 AFF i.e. with 24x3.8 TB SSD it's a real waste to let more that 7 TB (R4 option) of flash to a dedicate root aggregate. Thanks
... View more
No sorry. My question is wrong. I've just read the architecture guide and there's no virtual san below. Just a DAS with RAID and VMFS as datastore. On this vmdk for Ontap Select...
... View more
Is there somebody that has knowkedge about «virtual SAN» software that underlies sDOT in ONTAP Select? I don't think that NetApp has written something proprietary and the knowledge of a fine performing technology (i.e. StratoScale, IOScale, Starwind...) could be a strong point. Or maybe is VSAN from VMware? In the FAQ I've read that the RC1 support VMware as hypervisor. What they mean? That I can run VMware on Select or that VMware ESXi is the hypervisor where sDOT runs? Looking at this schema I should think that VSAN is below.
... View more
Coming back to the hardware universe I see that there aren't yet 4 ports adapter in the 10 GbE or the UTA2 families. The only 4 ports available cards are FCP/1 GbE/SAS. This can be a very big limit answering to public call for tender where maybe an 8020 is a good choice but they ask for a number of ports that is more than the configurable ones. A lot of storage vendors have on their portfolio expansion cards with 4 ports for 10 GbE or CNA. Is there a plan for NetApp to have these too? Regards
... View more
Hi, your words confirm what I knew about SFP+ types and cables. OM3 is the type normally used among the MM ones. I'll do another check but I'm quite sure it could be possibile to setup a cluster in this way. Thanks
... View more
Hi all, it there a way, an approximate one of course, that let us estimate the contribute of SSD on a FlashPool aggregate? Everywhere I read data that seems to be almost marketing one or the SPM contribute that could be not so easy to read in the real world. Very ofter we have to answer to customer requisite (public trial maybe) asking i.e. 600 IOPS for raw TB or 10 MB/s in sequential workloads... Are there answers to simple questions like these? (just examples) A 120 SAS hdd aggregate how much, nominal values of course, how much can increase in IOPS for a 70/30% r/w random workload if cached with a FlashPool? How much flash do you suggest, minimum value, as ratio of SAS/NL-SAS hdds? 10%, 20%...less? More? Thank you in advance
... View more
Hi, suppose I would setup a 4 node cluster in a large datacenter and that I would put a certain distances between the two pairs of node: different racks, different rooms/areas. If I put the pair of cluster switches CN1610 in the middle how long is the maximum supported distances between nodes and switches? Regards.
... View more
Hi everybody, once upon a time... In the past we must issue this command on all 8 Gbps switch port... portCfgFillWord #port 3 Today? I've read and observed the result after applying the configuration scripts for 6505 and 6510 models. There's nothing about fillword parameter. Is it needed? Somebody told me that new FOS versions don't need it. And, what's about 16 Gbps ports? Just for info without fillword=3 my FMC seems that it's working fine. PS) btw, pay attention that script configure ad 16 Gbps also the "store" ports. If you have an HBA card X1132 running ports at 8 Gbps your controller will not see the disks until you don't change the port speed at 8.
... View more
Hi, where I can find cabling schema e/o designs about available FMC MetroCluster in cDOT 8.3? Two nodes and four nodes? The TR3548 used for 7Mode was full of very good designs depicting the real deployment of cable to and from controller and switched. The TR4375 for cDOT instead contains only logical schema. Regards,
... View more
I've just discover that there are some news on 8.3.2 RC2 Release Notes. This has been extracted from that. Support for Cisco 9250i switches Starting with Data ONTAP 8.3.2, Cisco 9250i switches are supported in MetroCluster configurations. FCIP ports Cisco 9250i switches include FCIP 1/10-Gbps Ethernet ports that can be used for a single ISL. To configure these ports, see NetApp KB Article 1015624: How to configure the Cisco 9250i FC storage backend switch in MetroCluster for clustered Data ONTAP. Cisco 9250i switch cabling Aside from the two FCIP 1/10-Gbps Ethernet ports for FCIP ISLs, the Cisco 9250i switch cabling for MetroCluster configurations is the same as the Cisco 9148 or 9148S switches. There are some limitations (see kb) and the latency requirement can be difficult to reach but this is a starting point to use of FCIP wan links. Limitations One FCIP ISL per fabric The maximum ISL distance is 200km The maximum ISL Round-Trip Time between remote FCIP ports is 2ms. The FCIP ISL ports can only use 10Gbps speed FC ISLs are NOT supported on 9250i switches 1 MCC setup only per 9250i 9250i FCoE ports are not supported
... View more
Where I can find the auditing for OnCommand System Manager embedded in cDOT (8.3.1 version)?
In the messages or auditlog there's no trace at all of user activity of people who logint using https.
... View more
I've just read the new 3548 TR about Metrocluster and its architecture and I'm quite sure to have well understood that concept. I know fabric metrocluster for in the past I've set up several of them and, every time I was sure that there was a "dark fibre" on the ISL, a dedicated media or something that "come out" from some carrier multimodal line spilled out by a DWDM. Reading at the recommedations on that TR I have theoretically a confirmation. See image below. But, several times, it happens that customer declare to have some "FC/IP" line between distant sites, Cisco MDS 9513 and/or MDS 9222i used for other ISL using this "FC/IP" (I know this last one switch is in the MC matrix but I also know that the 4 switches must be dedicated to the MC!). In this case I've often heard that this kind of line can be used for the ISL but at the same time that on those is not native FCP running but Ethernet at 10 Gbps that incapsulate FC frames... I also know that this kind of line can be used by concurrent synchronous replication mechanisms, such as EMC VPLEX Metro...that uses Ethernet that incapsulates FC or, if any, can use native FC. So, this does not match with NetApp Fabric MC requirements. Is there some detailed document that can explain this? We're not wan communication experts so we can loose ourselves in this kind of analysis. Thank you very much in advance
... View more
No. No further answers. Read back here an old answer I've reported grin support. This seems by design. But, I repeat it, this should be fixed avoiding autosupport warnings that report it as a critical issue worrying customers!
... View more
A very long time ago we've started to wait for a new release of this software. Somebody was sure that the patch would be available for april 2015. We're in september and the only one is yet 5.5. Luckly we decided to convert all our volumes in thick format...(with high efforts to migrate!...) ...but it's incredible that from a storage that support thin provisioning this cannot be used if you're planning to adopt DR with VMware SRM!
... View more