Options
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Hi
i have several nodes with the following output in sysconfig -r:
...
RAID Disk Device HA SHELF BAY CHAN Pool Type RPM Used (MB/blks) Phys (MB/blks)
--------- ------ ------------- ---- ---- ---- ----- -------------- --------------
partner sw2_rz2:6.102 4c 6 6 FC:B 0 FCAL 15000 0/0 420156/860480768
partner sw1_rz2:7.21 4a 1 5 FC:A 0 FCAL 15000 0/0 420156/860480768
partner sw1_rz1:7.19 4b 1 3 FC:A 1 FCAL 15000 0/0 420156/860480768
partner sw1_rz1:6.82 4a 5 2 FC:A 1 FCAL 15000 0/0 420156/860480768
partner sw1_rz1:7.28 4a 1 12 FC:A 1 FCAL 15000 0/0 420156/860480768
partner sw1_rz1:6.101 4b 6 5 FC:A 1 FCAL 15000 0/0 420156/860480768
partner sw2_rz2:6.97 4d 6 1 FC:B 0 FCAL 15000 0/0 420156/860480768
partner sw1_rz2:6.103 4a 6 7 FC:A 0 FCAL 15000 0/0 420156/860480768
partner sw1_rz1:6.102 4a 6 6 FC:A 1 FCAL 15000 0/0 420156/860480768
partner sw1_rz1:8.20 4a 1 4 FC:A 1 FCAL 15000 418000/856064000 420156/860480768
partner sw2_rz2:6.107 4d 6 11 FC:B 0 FCAL 15000 0/0 420156/860480768
partner sw1_rz1:6.87 4b 5 7 FC:A 1 FCAL 15000 0/0 420156/860480768
i would expect only zeros in the used-column of partner disks
this is a metro-cluster ontap 8.1.4P8 7-Mode
Is there something i should be worried about?
yours
josef
Solved! See The Solution
1 ACCEPTED SOLUTION
cheese123 has accepted the solution
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Hi,
There is nothing to worry about this output. That is because filer does not access data on partner disks unless it does the takeover. In order to know the used size of the disk, RAID must read table of contents from that disk. Therefore, RAID usually reports only raw size of partner disks that results in showing used size for some, but not all partner disks.
Refer KB 3012254 "https://kb.netapp.com/support/index?page=content&id=3012254&actp=search&viewlocale=en_US&searchid=1452500241097" for more information and the Bug details.
Hope this helps.
If this post resolved your issue, help others by selecting ACCEPT AS SOLUTION or adding a KUDO.
3 REPLIES 3
cheese123 has accepted the solution
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Hi,
There is nothing to worry about this output. That is because filer does not access data on partner disks unless it does the takeover. In order to know the used size of the disk, RAID must read table of contents from that disk. Therefore, RAID usually reports only raw size of partner disks that results in showing used size for some, but not all partner disks.
Refer KB 3012254 "https://kb.netapp.com/support/index?page=content&id=3012254&actp=search&viewlocale=en_US&searchid=1452500241097" for more information and the Bug details.
Hope this helps.
If this post resolved your issue, help others by selecting ACCEPT AS SOLUTION or adding a KUDO.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Seems like the link is broken. use the following link or search for KB id 3012254
https://kb.netapp.com/support/index?page=content&id=3012254
If this post resolved your issue, help others by selecting ACCEPT AS SOLUTION or adding a KUDO.
Cannot find the answer you need? No need to open a support case - just CHAT and we’ll handle it for you.
Cannot find the answer you need? No need to open a support case - just CHAT and we’ll handle it for you.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Not to belabor the point but WHY some and not others?
The partner clearly was able to determine the USED info for one disk (sw1_rz1:8.20). What is the reasoning behind "some but not others"?
